Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Safety

Balancing The Safety Board

CSB head wants to diversify board membership

by Jeff Johnson
April 21, 2008 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 86, Issue 16

[+]Enlarge
Credit: CSB
Bresland talks to reporters during an investigation of a large chlorine release at DPC Enterprises in Glendale, Ariz., that injured 10 police officers.
Credit: CSB
Bresland talks to reporters during an investigation of a large chlorine release at DPC Enterprises in Glendale, Ariz., that injured 10 police officers.

Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) Chairman John S. Bresland wants to modify selection criteria for the five-person board so that no more than three commissioners are from the same political party.

The new criteria would make the political balance of CSB's membership similar to the five-member National Transportation Safety Board, upon which CSB is modeled, Bresland notes. The same criteria are also applied in the membership of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities & Exchange Commission, and other federal oversight bodies.

"We have been talking to people on Capitol Hill about this," Bresland tells C&EN. "In my opinion, it would be more logical to do it this way in today's world in Washington."

Bresland notes that with the current selection system, along with five-year board terms, a two-term president will wind up selecting all board members, making it likely the entire board will be in the same party. Current board members are all Republicans.

The board could profit from a more diverse membership and a "more interesting split of opinion," Bresland says. "A Democrat nominated to be on the board might come from an environmental organization or a labor union. This could give us a different point of view and maybe more balance, as well as perhaps a different approach in how we investigate chemical accidents."

Also, Bresland adds, designating party slots might smooth Senate confirmation, particularly when the White House and Senate are controlled by different parties. Sometimes this split results in a "little bumping of heads," he says.

For example, Bresland's Senate confirmation as CSB chairman was delayed nine months, even though he already served on the board. "I was told this wasn't due to anything against me personally, but that is the way it is in Washington, especially in an election year."

The board is still one position down. C. Russell H. Shearer, a Department of Energy official, was nominated last summer and still awaits Senate confirmation.

Bresland notes that the change in criteria for the board's makeup will require legislation and more discussion among the current board members.

Advertisement

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.