Issue Date: August 22, 2011
Handheld IR In The Hangar
Boeing expects to deliver its first 787 Dreamliner to All Nippon Airways in September. The Dreamliner is the first commercial airplane to be composed primarily of composite materials instead of a metal like aluminum.
Using new materials has forced Boeing to change the monitoring methods it uses in manufacturing planes. The organic materials—50% of the structural materials in the Dreamliner are carbon based—mean that the conventional electrical analyzers used to test mechanical strength and structural integrity in aluminum planes no longer apply.
To replace them, Boeing chemists Paul G. Vahey, Paul H. Shelley, and Gregory J. Werner have developed near- and mid-infrared spectroscopy methods using handheld devices that can be used to test planes and parts during manufacture and maintenance. They have worked with scientists at instrument companies A2 Technologies, now part of Agilent, and Polychromix, now part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, to adapt their instruments for measurements on airplanes.
The different regions of the IR spectrum are suitable for testing different properties of the airplanes. For example, the Boeing chemists use near-IR to measure the thickness of coatings on the plane. Those coatings include paints, primers, adhesives, and sealants. Mid-IR tells them about chemical changes in the composition of the resins and epoxies used in the underlying composite.
“A wide variety of coatings protect our materials over ambient temperatures ranging from –60 °F to 140 °F, depending on what part of the plane you’re talking about,” Vahey says. “The coatings are getting thinner and thinner to save weight. As we’re launching this generation of 787, the coatings are thinner than they’ve ever been.”
Those thin coatings make near-IR light, which can penetrate several thousandths of an inch into a material, an ideal probe. Such thin layers are extremely difficult to measure accurately with conventional devices such as micrometers.
With the new handheld infrared methods, the thickness resolution Boeing scientists can achieve depends on the particular composite material and its ability to transmit light. Near-IR is generally restricted to the coatings. “You can look at the top layer of resin in a composite matrix, but as soon as you hit carbon fibers, the infrared light pretty much stops,” Vahey says.
In contrast, mid-IR spectra provide information about chemical changes in the structural composite. “Infrared can easily see chemical changes in the epoxy,” says John Seelenbinder, an applications and product manager at Agilent who has worked with the Boeing scientists. “The difficult part is that the epoxy is in a carbon-fiber matrix. The carbon fiber is a nonspecific absorber that absorbs much of the light.”
That means IR methods are “limited to looking at materials over the topmost layer of carbon fiber,” Vahey says. “That still leaves a great deal of chemistry and coatings to evaluate.” But they don’t really need to see more than the topmost layer at a time, because the materials are multilayer laminates. If the top layer is damaged, mechanics sand it away and test the next layer, until there is no more discernible damage. Mid-IR measurements can tell mechanics responsible for maintenance and repair whether heat damage has led to changes in the underlying resin. “If they’re going to repair an area where they have delamination due to heat damage, they don’t want to bond it to resin that is compromised,” Seelenbinder says. “They’re looking to map out all the area where the resin has been affected.”
“We’re providing information that has only recently become available outside the laboratory,” Vahey says. Engineers and technicians in quality control, manufacturing, and maintenance are evaluating how they can use information gleaned from handheld IR measurements.
To gain the confidence of customers and Boeing’s own measurement scientists, Vahey and his coworkers compare the IR methods head-to-head with the old methods. “One of our hardest challenges has been convincing ourselves that these methods can stand up,” Vahey continues. “We’re in a very conservative industry. There’s no room for error on an airplane.”
To provide that kind of confidence, Boeing scientists create standards that can be analyzed both ways. They also use traditional methods to verify that their IR results are in the right ballpark.
Meanwhile, Vahey and his colleagues have started training the engineers and technicians who will use the technology in the manufacturing plant. “Spectroscopy is not something you can just pick up like a hammer,” he says. “It takes a little time to get used to it.”
Plus, the instruments are heavier than a hammer. Agilent has two handheld spectrometers. The larger one weighs 7 lb, including the optics, the controller, and the battery. By moving the battery and controller to a belt and connecting them to the optics by a cable, they have pushed the handheld weight down to 3.5 lb.
Boeing hopes that its suppliers will adopt the technology as well. “Once parts get to us, it’s final assembly,” Vahey says. “The ideal is to make measurements upstream of the point of manufacture, where something can be changed.” Boeing has put enough faith in the handheld spectroscopic methods that the company has included them in the repair manual for the 787. ◾
- Chemical & Engineering News
- ISSN 0009-2347
- Copyright © American Chemical Society