Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Materials

Modeling Nanotube Reactions

Theoretical Chemistry: Approach predicts outcome of nanotube functionalization

by Lauren K. Wolf
May 14, 2012 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 90, Issue 20

[+]Enlarge
Credit: J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Sodium cholate-coated nanotubes (top) undergo functionalization with chemical groups differently than CTAB-coated nanotubes (bottom).
(Top) A molecular model of a blue cylindrical molecule (a nanotube) heavily decorated with red-tipped clusters. (Bottom) A molecular model of blue cylinder decorated with white and grey chains.
Credit: J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Sodium cholate-coated nanotubes (top) undergo functionalization with chemical groups differently than CTAB-coated nanotubes (bottom).

Using molecular dynamics simulations and reaction modeling, researchers at MIT have predicted the extent of a reaction to functionalize carbon nanotubes (J. Am. Chem. Soc., DOI: 10.1021/ja301635e). Their approach should help scientists optimally modify nanotubes with chemical groups for integration into electronic devices and sensors.

“The problem with carbon nanotubes is that they are water insoluble,” says Daniel Blankschtein, one of the MIT team leaders. As a result, scientists often disperse them in aqueous solutions with surfactants.

When researchers run chemical reactions on nanotube surfaces, “the elephant in the room” is that “you’re actually doing chemistry through a surfactant-adsorbed layer,” says Michael S. Strano, team coleader. Previous experiments and models of nanotube functionalization haven’t fully addressed this coating, he adds.

By comparing their computational data with experimental data, however, Blankschtein, Strano, and coworkers have closely examined the covalent binding of an aryl diazonium salt to single-walled carbon nanotubes decorated with various surfactants. Diazonium salts are promising, tailorable reagents for nanotube functionalization. Surfactants play a big role in controlling both the selectivity and extent of reaction, the researchers found.

The team showed that, depending on their charge, the surfactants’ head groups create “hot” or “cold” spots on the nanotubes’ surfaces that either attract or repel the diazonium cations. Nanotubes decorated with the positively charged surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), for instance, have cold spots and a low binding affinity for diazonium cations.

Surfactant flexibility also affects the reaction. For example, even though sodium cholate is negatively charged, the rigid surfactant packs tightly on the nanotubes and severely limits the number of diazonium cations that ultimately bind.

“To controllably functionalize nanotubes is very important,” says James M. Tour, a chemist at Rice University. “We’ve yet to see how generalized this approach will be in the hands of others, but the authors did a good job of showing its efficacy in the cases tested.”

Strano tells C&EN the team is particularly interested in next extending its method to materials such as graphene.

Advertisement

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.