Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Physical Chemistry

How To Salvage Rejected X-ray Crystallography Data

Including diffraction data that’s usually thrown away could improve crystal structures

by Carmen Drahl
May 28, 2012 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 90, Issue 22

[+]Enlarge
Credit: Science
Electron density in a protein X-ray structure improves with sulfur atom phase data from multiple crystals. (Data from one crystal at left, seven crystals at right.)
Two sets of molecules depicted as sticks covered in blue nets. The one on the right is more detailed and has more netting material.
Credit: Science
Electron density in a protein X-ray structure improves with sulfur atom phase data from multiple crystals. (Data from one crystal at left, seven crystals at right.)

During their quests for biomolecule structures, X-ray crystallographers toss out data that’s useful after all, two independent teams contend in the journal Science. They report strategies for using traditionally ignored information to improve structures’ quality. When solving an unfamiliar protein’s structure, crystallographers obtain phase information to interpret X-ray diffraction patterns. For that task, they normally employ heavy atoms, such as selenium, but this isn’t always straightforward. For four different proteins, Qun Liu of the New York Structural Biology Center, Wayne A. Hendrickson of Columbia University, and colleagues combined data from multiple crystals, demonstrating that typically neglected information in a protein’s own sulfur atoms provides phase assistance with no heavy atoms needed (DOI: 10.1126/science.1218753). P. Andrew Karplus of Oregon State University and Kay Diederichs of the University of Konstanz, Germany, developed a statistical quantity called CC*. Compared with established criteria, CC* better tells researchers at what point the outer edges of diffraction patterns should be cut from calculations, the authors say (DOI: 10.1126/science.1218231). Pattern edges give the highest resolution information about atomic positions but can get clouded by noise, a tough trade-off that the authors suggest CC* resolves.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.