Assay Detects Miniscule Amounts Of Gluten In Food | Chemical & Engineering News
Latest News
Web Date: February 20, 2014

Assay Detects Minuscule Amounts Of Gluten In Food

Analytical Chemistry: A new method based on small nucleic acid receptors senses gluten levels lower than 1 ppm
Department: Science & Technology | Collection: Life Sciences
News Channels: Analytical SCENE, Biological SCENE
Keywords: celiac disease, gluten, gluten-free, gliadin, aptamer, food allergy
Hide and Seek
Many gluten detection methods can’t measure concentrations lower than 20 ppm, so “gluten-free” labels don’t reassure people with a very low tolerance for the protein.
Credit: Shutterstock
Hide and Seek
Many gluten detection methods can’t measure concentrations lower than 20 ppm, so “gluten-free” labels don’t reassure people with a very low tolerance for the protein.
Credit: Shutterstock

A food that’s labeled “gluten-free” isn’t necessarily free of gluten: It can contain up to 20 ppm of the protein. Yet for some people with celiac disease, even minute amounts of gluten will trigger intestinal pain and other symptoms. To improve upon current detection methods, researchers in Spain have created a new type of gluten assay that senses gluten concentrations as low as 0.5 ppm (Anal. Chem. 2014, DOI: 10.1021/ac404151n).

Gluten is a complex mixture of proteins found in some grains, including wheat, barley, and rye. Partially digested peptides from gluten spur a celiac patient’s immune cells to attack the lining of the small intestine, causing intense pain, growth delays, infertility, or other symptoms. The only remedy for celiac disease, which affects about 1% of people in the U.S. and Europe, is to stick to a gluten-free diet.

In the U.S. and much of Europe, a gluten-free label indicates that a product holds less than 20 ppm gluten, close to the limit of detection of traditional antibody-based tests. María Jesús Lobo-Castañón of the University of Oviedo, in Spain, and her colleagues work on biosensors and wanted to develop a test for allergens. After learning that a colleague was so gluten-sensitive that even products labeled gluten-free could trigger his symptoms, they decided to devise a sensitive test for gluten.

Typical gluten detection tests depend on antibodies that specifically bind to gluten or portions of it. But small nucleic acid receptors, or aptamers, are easier to make and tweak, more stable, and less expensive than antibodies, Lobo-Castañón says.

Lobo-Castañón’s group first chose a target from gluten’s complex protein mixture. They picked one of the most immunotoxic constituents of gluten: a 33-amino-acid stretch from the protein gliadin. To identify an aptamer against the gliadin peptide, the Spanish group began with a very large library of random DNA sequences, each 80 nucleotides long. The researchers identified sequences that bound to the gliadin fragment, separated them, and amplified them. They repeated the process 10 times to find the aptamer with the greatest affinity for their gliadin fragment.

Aptamer in hand, the scientists put together a competitive gluten detection assay. They attached the gliadin peptide to magnetic beads. Then they mixed a food sample with the beads and added a small amount of aptamer. Any gluten in the food competes with the gliadin on the beads to bind to the aptamer, which allows the researchers to detect very low levels of gluten present in the food. By measuring the percentage of aptamer bound to gliadin, the researchers could calculate how much gluten was in the food, at levels as low as 0.5 ppm.

The researchers found that their aptamer bound tightly to wheat, barley, and rye flours, but not at all to corn, rice, and soy flours, which are naturally gluten-free. Using the technique, they also tested soy baby formula and a cake mix with known gluten concentrations. Their test confirmed that no gluten was in the cake mix and that the baby formula had 16 ppm gluten.

José Manuel Pingarrón of Complutense University of Madrid sees promise in the new method. It shows more reliable results “at low concentrations, where other methods fail,” he says. More sensitive gluten testing would be a boon for those people affected by even a smidgen of the protein.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Daniel Lawton  (April 26, 2014 12:58 AM)
I sure hope they bring this to market. I've been in Taipei for 2 weeks now, helping with engineering problems. I've found nothing whatsoever I can eat in any restaurant in Taipei, and absolutely no awareness of the problem here. It is in fact insulting to even question what's in food here. If I had a test like this, I might find things to eat. Hopefully it'll be more convenient than current tests which take a long time and cost too much to use casually.
Karl G. Karl Ph.D.  (October 21, 2014 10:55 PM)
I would like to purchase this assay for my laboratory and validation. Thank you, Karl
Tina Brooks  (October 10, 2015 5:19 PM)
I would like to see this assay available to food manufacturing companies. The most sensitive tests we've seen to date only go so low as 7ppm!
Leave A Comment