Volume 93 Issue 45 | p. 5 | News of The Week
Issue Date: November 16, 2015 | Web Date: November 12, 2015

This Liquid Has Holes In It, Thanks To Chemistry

Materials Science: Liquid made with cage compounds has permanent pores and could one day help with gas separations
Department: Science & Technology
News Channels: Materials SCENE, Nano SCENE, Organic SCENE
Keywords: porosity, crown ether, cage compound, gas separation
To generate a holey liquid (bottle), researchers dissolved a porous core structure (space-filling) with crown-ether decorations (ball and stick) in a crown-ether solvent. C = gray, O = red, N = blue, H = white.
Credit: Nature
Dissolving crown-ether cage compound in crown-ether solvent yields liquid with permanent porosity (shown in bottle).
To generate a holey liquid (bottle), researchers dissolved a porous core structure (space-filling) with crown-ether decorations (ball and stick) in a crown-ether solvent. C = gray, O = red, N = blue, H = white.
Credit: Nature

How is a new type of liquid like the London Underground? In both, one must mind the gaps.

Stuart James of Queen’s University Belfast and coworkers have devised a liquid with permanent porosity (Nature 2015, DOI: 10.1038/nature16072). Such holey fluids could be useful in gas separation, process chemistry, and other applications, if they can be made economically. Their persistent porosity comes from hollow organic cage molecules coated with solvent-soluble surface groups. The cage openings are too small to be clogged by the surface groups or by large solvent molecules in the surrounding solvent.

Liquids contain spaces between their molecules, but they are tiny. Bubbles can be blown into liquids, but they will quickly float to the surface and dissipate—air bubbles in glass being a rare exception.

On the other hand, solids such as zeolites and metal-organic frameworks have permanent pores. They can be used to separate molecules by size and can host added catalysts to drive chemical reactions. But unlike liquids, these materials can’t flow through channels or be smoothed onto surfaces.

James got the idea for holey liquids a decade ago, when a colleague, Queen’s University chemical engineer David W. Rooney, wondered whether mixtures of porous solids and liquids might be pumped through pipes and used in continuous processes more easily than is generally possible with porous solids alone.

Porous solids expert Russell Morris of the University of St. Andrews comments that the concept of liquids with permanent porosity has actually been around for decades, but “the practicalities of designing such a system take skill and perseverance. This work delivers real liquids that show that property, which is a great achievement.”

The researchers initially achieved liquid porosity by dissolving a hollow organic core structure coated with crown-ether surface groups in a crown-ether solvent. To optimize gas absorption capacity, the team packed the fluid with as many cage molecules as possible—one for every 12 solvent molecules. When exposed to methane, the liquid absorbs eight times as much gas as the solvent alone.

But the crown ethers were hard to synthesize and the liquid thick and slow-flowing. So collaborators Andrew I. Cooper and Rebecca L. Greenaway at the University of Liverpool developed another porous liquid by coating a hollow organic cage with a mixture of diamines and dissolving it in the solvent hexachloropropene. The resulting porous liquid flows ten times as readily as the crown-ether-based material. The researchers synthesize the coated cages in a single step, and the solvent is available commercially.

In earlier work, Shannon M. Mahurin and Sheng Dai at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and coworkers created hollow colloidal silica nanoparticles with a fluidlike polymer surface coating (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201409420), but the new porous liquids are easier to molecularly modify. Dai comments that “the liquids will open up new frontiers in how we think about porosity.”

The surface area and gas uptake of the new materials are too modest for them to compete with porous solids immediately, says cage compound specialist Michael Mastalerz of Germany’s Heidelberg University in a Nature commentary. “They should instead be seen as a prototype of a new class of material [that] will undoubtedly find technological applications” if these properties can be improved.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Thomas Heavey (Sun Nov 15 09:41:49 EST 2015)
Germany is misspelled.
Stu Borman (Tue Nov 17 09:07:18 EST 2015)
Sorry about the error, and thanks for pointing it out. It was apparently an editing error. It has now been corrected on this page, but unfortunately it could not be corrected in the print version. Thanks again. -- Stu Borman
Leave A Comment