1
Facebook
Volume 94 Issue 10 | p. 15 | News of The Week
Issue Date: March 7, 2016 | Web Date: March 2, 2016

Dow settles price-fixing suit for $800 million

The death of Antonin Scalia left the company’s petition without a champion on the bench
Department: Business
Keywords: litigation, price fixing, polyurethanes, Supreme Court
[+]Enlarge
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s untimely death prompted Dow to settle an antitrust case.Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s untimely death prompted Dow to settle an antitrust case.
Credit: Jeff Malet Photography/Newscom
09410-notw10-scaliaport
 
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s untimely death prompted Dow to settle an antitrust case.Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s untimely death prompted Dow to settle an antitrust case.
Credit: Jeff Malet Photography/Newscom

The sudden death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia may have cost Dow Chemical big money.

The Michigan-based chemical giant has agreed to an $835 million settlement in a decadelong dispute over alleged fixing of polyurethane raw material prices. Citing “recent events in the Supreme Court,” the company says it is unlikely to receive a favorable ruling in a petition to set aside a lower court’s $1.1 billion judgment against it.

Some 2,400 customers maintain that Dow as well as competitors BASF, Bayer, Huntsman Corp., and LyondellBasell Industries tried to fix prices of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate, polyols, and urethane systems between 1999 and 2003.

A Department of Justice investigation in 2007 yielded no charges. Dow’s rivals settled their cases for a total consideration of $139 million in 2011.

Dow decided to fight the matter in the courts. A federal jury later ordered Dow to pay $400 million, which a District Court judge in Kansas increased to $1.1 billion. Dow lost on appeal in 2014 and asked the Supreme Court last year to set aside the judgment.

In its petition, Dow’s lawyers argued that the lower court inappropriately certified the polyurethanes customers as a class in order to simplify a complex antitrust lawsuit. Prices, Dow said, are negotiated individually between customers and suppliers, and some customers were able to negotiate their way out of price increases. Including them in the class eliminated Dow’s due process rights to fight against individual claims and entitled customers to damages even when they suffered no harm.

Treating the customers as a class, Dow argued, goes against the precedent set by two decisions authored by Justice Scalia: Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes and Comcast Corp. v. Behrend. Dow’s petition was awaiting a decision on another case before the Supreme Court, Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, that also hinges on the differences between individual class members.

Justice Scalia died of natural causes on Feb. 13. His passing presents an opportunity for President Obama to replace the conservative stalwart with a more liberal nominee.

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Leave A Comment