ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The chairman of the House Science Committee, Rep. Sherwood L. Boehlert (R-N.Y.), has introduced a bill that would help refill the now-empty Superfund, the federal trust fund for cleaning up abandoned hazardous waste sites.
The bill (H.R. 4199) would reinstate one part of the three-pronged Superfund tax that expired at the end of 1995. The legislation would again tax corporate profits over $2 million at a rate of 0.12 % and dedicate the revenue to the Superfund account.
“That's a negligible burden to provide dedicated funds for restoring Superfund sites,” Boehlert says. In 1995, this so-called corporate environmental tax raised about $700 million for Superfund, he says.
Boehlert’s bill would not reinstate the other two parts of the Superfund tax—levies on chemical feedstocks and crude oil. Chemical makers and oil companies, which paid billions of dollars into Superfund over the 15 years these levies were in place, are staunchly opposed to the resurrection of these industry-specific taxes.
EPA uses Superfund monies to respond to emergencies, such as chemical spills, that threaten public health and for long-term, permanent cleanup of polluted properties.
This trust fund, established in 1980 under legislation aimed at making polluters pay for cleanup, essentially ran out of money in 2003 (C&EN, Sept. 9, 2002, page 31). Since then, Congress has funded EPA's Superfund activities almost entirely from general tax revenues.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter