Cleaning Water With 'Nanorust' | November 13, 2006 Issue - Vol. 84 Issue 46 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 84 Issue 46 | p. 12 | News of The Week
Issue Date: November 13, 2006

Cleaning Water With 'Nanorust'

Magnetite nanoparticles effectively remove arsenic from water
Department: Science & Technology
News Channels: Nano SCENE
Oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticle (orange) binds arsenic (gray spheres).
Credit: Courtesy of Rice University
8446notw4molecule
 
Oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticle (orange) binds arsenic (gray spheres).
Credit: Courtesy of Rice University

Rust, olive oil, and a handheld magnet could someday be all that's needed to remove arsenic from drinking water, according to researchers at Rice University. The low-tech solution to a serious problem for developing countries stems from basic research on the magnetic behavior of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (Science 2006, 314, 964).

On the basis of extrapolations from the bulk material, an impractically large magnetic field would be needed to draw Fe3O4 nanoparticles out of solution. But how materials behave in bulk isn't always a good predictor of how they'll act at the nanometer scale.

Having just figured out how to make Fe3O4 nanoparticles in various sizes and keep them from clumping by coating them with oleic acid, chemistry professor Vicki L. Colvin and colleagues decided to see how strong a magnet would be needed to pull their new nanoparticles out of solution. "We were surprised to find that we didn't need large electromagnets to move our nanoparticles, and in some cases, handheld magnets could do the trick," she says.

"In this instance, it turns out that the nanoparticles actually exert forces on each other," explains Douglas Natelson, a Rice physics professor who participated in the study. "So, once the handheld magnets start gently pulling on a few nanoparticles and getting things going, the nanoparticles effectively work together to pull themselves out of the water."

Iron oxides are known to bind arsenic, so Colvin's team decided to see if size, and therefore surface area, made a difference in arsenic remediation. They found that Fe3O4 particles 12 nm in diameter removed nearly all the arsenic from solution, but the same mass of 300-nm Fe3O4 particles eliminated less than 30% of the poison.

"This is interesting work," comments Troy J. Tranter, who is working on arsenic remediation at the Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory. "From a practical perspective, it would be interesting to see how this material would be used in an engineered system."

Colvin is trying to tackle that issue. "Although the nanoparticles used in the publication are expensive, we are working on new approaches to their production that use rust and olive oil and require no more facilities than a kitchen with a gas cooktop," she says.

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment