ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The Environmental Protection Agency's plan to reorganize its network of 26 libraries is plagued with serious managerial problems, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office. GAO cites a number of problems with the plan, including that it lacks procedures for informing the staff and public of decisions on closings, an evaluation of alternatives and their costs or benefits, and a post-reorganizational strategy to ensure the continuity of necessary library services.
The report (GAO-08-304) was the topic of a March 13 hearing held by the House Science & Technology Subcommittee on Investigations & Oversight during which EPA was heavily criticized for its actions.
"The most generous possible explanation is that EPA managers were stunningly incompetent," said subcommittee Chair Brad Miller (D-N.C.). "The EPA ignored its own careful plans and abruptly closed libraries, limited access to the public and EPA employees, and just threw away documents that may be irreplaceable."
EPA began its library reorganization in 2006 because of anticipated budget cuts that never happened. Several libraries were to be closed, access to others was to be reduced, and much of the information was to be disposed of or digitized. Widespread concerns of government watchdog groups and Congress about the impact of EPA's actions on the availability of information forced the agency to impose a moratorium on any further changes to the network.
GAO recommends that EPA continue the moratorium until the agency takes a number of corrective actions. These include justifying its decision to reorganize the library network, improving its outreach efforts, ensuring sufficient oversight of the project, and implementing procedures for the proper dispersal and disposal of library materials.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter