Web Date: July 14, 2008
Court Overturns Regulation On Power Plant Emissions
EPA needs to completely rewrite a Clean Air Act regulation designed to reduce power plant pollution linked to smog and acid rain, a federal court ruled on July 11.
The Bush Administration's 2005 Clean Air Interstate Rule, or CAIR, contains "several fatal flaws," the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said.
The regulation was aimed at reducing emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from power plants in 28 eastern states and the District of Columbia. SO2 causes acid rain, whereas NOx is a precursor to ground-level ozone, or smog.
The rule set a cap for the pollutants across the region, rather than requiring all facilities to cut their releases of the substances. It allowed power plants that reduced their emissions the most to sell allowances to facilities that maintained or increased their releases of SO2 and NOx.
North Carolina and several utilities challenged the rule in court. North Carolina argued the regulation would allow power plants in neighboring states to emit more pollution that would blow into its jurisdiction. Utilities, meanwhile, argued that the rule was not fair in allocating allowances for pollution reductions.
The court agreed with both arguments. A three-judge panel directed EPA to start from scratch on a regulation to reduce SO2 and NOx from power plants. "No amount of tinkering ??? will transform CAIR, as written, into an acceptable rule," the court explained.
CAIR was one of the two hallmark regulations of the Bush Administration under the Clean Air Act. Federal courts have now struck both down. The other rule controlled mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants and was overturned in February (C&EN, Feb. 18, page 6).
The two decisions essentially leave it up to President George W. Bush's successor to rework the overturned rules, and they let utilities continue their current emissions until new regulations are finalized.
The rulings could push Congress into passing pending legislation that would reduce SO2, NOx, and mercury—and perhaps carbon dioxide, as well—from power plants.
- Chemical & Engineering News
- ISSN 0009-2347
- Copyright © American Chemical Society