Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

CSB Seeks Advice On Safe Substitutes

by Jeffrey W. Johnson
May 3, 2010 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 88, Issue 18

The Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is seeking public input on the design of a congressionally mandated study on the use of methyl isocyanate (MIC) in chemical plants. Last year, Congress allocated $600,000 for a National Academy of Sciences study to examine alternatives available to protect workers and the public from a leak of MIC, the chemical released in 1984 in Bhopal, India, causing the death of thousands of residents. The funding followed an accident at the Bayer CropScience plant in West Virginia, which killed two workers and occurred within 80 feet of a 37,000-lb-capacity MIC storage tank. The study, according to the board, will determine the possibility of MIC reduction, substitution, or elimination at the Bayer plant, but it could also lay the groundwork for a better understanding of how chemical companies can adopt inherently safer technologies. The academy is now putting the review panel together. CSB is seeking comments on the panel’s makeup and the study design, as well as whether the board should request the academy to examine additional topics such as the use of hydrofluoric acid in refineries or chlorine in water treatment plants. Comments are due on May 10.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.