Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



Obama Continues R&D Support

Government: Fiscal 2013 budget shows Administration’s commitment to science and education

by Susan R. Morrissey
February 16, 2012

President Barack Obama is requesting $140.8 billion for federal R&D in his fiscal 2013 budget, which was rolled out on Feb. 13. The total R&D budget—which includes defense and nondefense work—is 1.4%, or $2.0 billion, more than that in fiscal 2012. It increases funding for basic science research and for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education.

The increase is significant because the discretionary part of the budget, which funds nonmandatory programs such as R&D, is frozen at 2011 levels. Discretionary funding represents about a third of the overall $3.8 trillion proposed budget.

“The budget that we’re releasing today is a reflection of shared responsibility,” the President said when announcing the budget request. “It says that we’re serious about investing in our future and investing in community colleges, and investing in new energy technology, and investing in basic research, [and] well, we’ve got to pay for it,” referring to the cuts the Administration has made to reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over the next decade.

Of the total R&D budget, $64.9 billion will go to nondefense work, a 5.0% increase over the 2012 level. The R&D increases are in part offset by cuts to the Department of Defense’s weapon-systems development activities.

“The priority the President attaches to R&D and STEM education, as reflected in his 2013 budget, is justified by the historic truth that investments in innovation and education today will more than pay for themselves tomorrow,” John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science & Technology (OSTP) and science and technology adviser to the President, said in a statement.

The President’s budget request raises the overall funding of three key basic science agencies: the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards & Technology, and the Department of Energy’s Office of Science. NSF is slated for a 4.8% increase to $7.4 billion in overall funding; NIST, a 14.1% increase to $857 million; and DOE Office of Science, a 2.6% increase to $5.0 billion. These increases keep the three agencies on a doubling track as outlined in the America Competes Reauthorization Act, but will delay the target completion date.

To support job growth, the 2013 request includes $2.2 billion for advanced manufacturing R&D programs at various federal agencies. To promote clean energy, the request provides $2.6 billion for the U.S. Global Change Research Program to understand, predict, mitigate, and adapt to climate changes.

The President also funds STEM education to the tune of $3.0 billion, up 2.6% from 2012. Spread across 13 federal agencies, the funding will focus on supporting evidence-based improvements in teaching and learning.

Overall funding of NIH, on the other hand, will remain at $30.8 billion in 2013 under the request.

Reaction to the President’s budget request was mixed, with general science supporters happy to see positive gains, but those working in sectors now set to see cuts less pleased.

“We are gratified to see that while necessary cuts have been made in the budget, the President has maintained support for the drivers that can strengthen our economic engine,” American Chemical Society President Bassam Z. Shakhashiri said in a statement. ACS, which publishes C&EN, represents some 164,000 chemistry-related professionals.

The trade group American Chemistry Council has a different perspective: “The President’s budget proposal will make it more difficult for America’s chemistry industry to compete globally and create jobs,” the group, which is unhappy with proposed tax increases in the budget, said in a statement.

On Capitol Hill, Republicans quickly denounced the proposed budget. “The President’s budget is a gloomy reflection of his failed policies of the past, not a bold plan for American’s future,” said House of Representatives Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) in a statement. “Our nation needs Washington to demonstrate some courage with a budget that honestly addresses the near- and long-term challenges we face,” said the speaker, who said his party would soon offer its own 2013 budget proposal.



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

rakesh (February 17, 2012 5:15 AM)
Why there is decline of R&D and its related field. Perhaps, research is not very much evaluated or considered as successful career. It is true there is lot of uncertainty in research field but some has to take initiative and must awareness towards R&D.
V.L. (May 21, 2012 10:32 PM)
"On Capitol Hill, Republicans quickly denounced the proposed budget."

Seriously? If your chemistry research reports are as misleading and sloppy as this article, then I would say you are not to be trusted with any taxpayers money.

If Republicans denounced the budget, what was the Democrats' response? I'll help you: None! They haven't proposed a budget since Barack Obama became president.

And now, we know how many Democrats along with Republicans also denounced the WH budget: All in the senate (99-0), all in the house (414-0). The Democratic party doesn't even want to debate the budget.

Unbelievable, you are as incompetent with your reporting as our current President is with the budget.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment