Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

Study Questions MCHM Toxicity Research

by Elizabeth K. Wilson
July 21, 2014 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 92, Issue 29

A new study of crude 4-methylcyclo­hexanemethanol (MCHM)—the chemical that spilled and tainted water supplies in West Virginia in January—indicates that it is more toxic to the freshwater indicator organism Daphnia magna than shown in previous studies. The work, which has not yet been published or peer reviewed, came from the lab of Andrew J. Whelton at the University of South Alabama, who reported the results at a July 10 national conference of public health officials. Whelton’s group exposed the organism to crude MCHM, and found a no observed effect level (NOEL) of 6.25 mg/L, in contrast with the 50 mg/L found in previous studies on D. magna performed by Eastman Chemical in 1998. The reasons for the different results are not yet clear. The newly reported toxicity levels are far higher than those found in drinking water after the spill. Whelton also cautioned that the study “has no relevance in humans.” Eastman says it has no reason to question the conclusion of the authors of the 1998 studies. Whelton says he hopes other labs will try to replicate the work.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.