ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Business

AbbVie Drops Plan To Purchase Shire

Pharmaceuticals: U.S. company cites change in tax regulations for shift

by Michael McCoy
October 16, 2014

Citing new U.S. tax regulations, the U.S. drug company AbbVie says it is pulling the plug on its $54 billion acquisition of the British drugmaker Shire.

When it was announced in July, the deal would have allowed AbbVie to reincorporate in the U.K. and lower its tax rate considerably. However, last month the U.S. Treasury Department announced new rules that would make such transactions, known as inversions, less lucrative. AbbVie says its board is now recommending that shareholders vote against the purchase.

Shire says it is considering the situation. It noted earlier that AbbVie must pay a $1.6 billion breakup fee if it cancels the deal.

From the start of its pursuit of Shire in May, AbbVie executives insisted that the tax advantage of the deal was only one reason for pursuing it. Now, though, it’s the only reason for dropping it.

“Although the strategic rationale of combining our two companies remains strong, the agreed-upon valuation is no longer supported as a result of the changes to the tax rules,” AbbVie CEO Richard A. Gonzalez said in announcing the change of course.

In its announcement, AbbVie took a swipe at what it calls the U.S. government’s “unilateral” change in regulations. It complained about “the unexpected nature of the exercise of administrative authority to impact long-standing tax principles” and how the rules would treat it “differently than either other inverted companies or foreign domiciled entities.”

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment