ADVERTISEMENT
3 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

Opposition To Neonicotinoids Intensified

Pesticides: As scientific evidence mounted, regulators scrambled to review impacts on bees

by Britt E. Erickson
December 21, 2015 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 93, ISSUE 49

COVER STORY

Opposition To Neonicotinoids Intensified

The agrochemical industry faced growing pressure in 2015 to phase out neonicotinoids, a class of pesticides that has been blamed for harming bees and other pollinators. Regulators in the U.S. halted new uses of four neonicotinoids in April, and the European Food Safety Authority declared in August that the chemicals pose a higher risk to bees than previously thought (EFSA J. 2015, DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4210, 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4211, and 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4212).

A two-year ban on the use of three neonicotinoids—clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam—in the European Union is set to end this month, unless the European Commission extends it. EFSA is currently reassessing the risks posed from use of the three chemicals in seed treatments and granular form. Environmental groups and beekeepers are urging the agency to recommend a permanent ban.

In the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency is also assessing the risks of the three pesticides. EPA expects to complete its assessments in 2017.

Pesticides that work similarly to neonicotinoids also came under additional scrutiny this year. For example, EPA was directed to remove sulfoxaflor from the U.S. market as part of a federal appeals court ruling in September because of concerns that it is harmful to bees. Environmental groups sued EPA after it approved sulfoxaflor in 2013, claiming the agency failed to address effects of the chemical on bees.

Similar to neonicotinoids, sulfoxaflor binds to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, replacing acetylcholine.But manufacturer Dow AgroSciences claims that the insecticide is a sulfoximine, not a neonicotinoid. The company is working with EPA to review data on the adverse effects of sulfoxaflor on pollinators in the hopes of getting the pesticide back on the U.S. market for the 2016 growing season.

U.S. beekeepers reported losses of about 42% of honeybee colonies from April 2014 to April 2015, up from 34% for April 2013 to April 2014. Neonicotinoid pesticides are one of many factors thought to be contributing to these declines.

[+]Enlarge
Credit: Dara Stanley
A buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) lands on an apple blossom.
Credit: Dara Stanley
A buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) lands on an apple blossom.

The Obama Administration is trying to get a better handle on pollinator declines and improve pollinator health. In May, a White House task force issued a science-based research plan and a strategy, which among other things aims to reduce honeybee losses to economically sustainable levels by 2025 and restore 7 million acres of pollinator habitat over the next five years.

“Pollinators are critical to the nation’s economy, food security, and environmental health,” John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy, said when the strategy was announced. “Honeybee pollination alone adds more than $15 billion in value to agricultural crops each year and helps ensure that our diets include ample fruits, nuts, and vegetables.”

Meanwhile, the evidence against neonicotinoids continues to mount. Research suggests that the pesticides impair bees’ behavior, learning abilities, and reproduction. New work published in November also shows that bees exposed to the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam are less effective pollinators (Nature 2015, DOI: 10.1038/nature16167). Less effective pollination leads to lower-quality food crops.

Earlier this year, researchers reported that bees are attracted to neonicotinoids. Bees apparently catch a buzz from the pesticides and keep coming back for more, even though the chemicals adversely affect their behavior and growth (Nature 2015, DOI: 10.1038/nature14414).

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment