ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

Clarifying The Clean Water Act’s Reach

Regulation: Business groups and members of Congress decry Obama Administration rule

by Jessica Morrison
May 28, 2015

[+]Enlarge
Credit: Shutterstock
Many members of Congress are pushing legislation to stop the new Clean Water Act regulation.
20150528lnp3-waterfall.jpg
Credit: Shutterstock
Many members of Congress are pushing legislation to stop the new Clean Water Act regulation.

After a years-long tussle with Congress and other stakeholders, the Obama Administration on May 27 issued a regulation that spells out which U.S. waterways are protected under the Clean Water Act, the federal law that controls water pollution and aims to conserve wetlands.

“For the water in the rivers and lakes in our communities that flow to our drinking water to be clean, the streams and wetlands that feed them need to be clean too,” Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy says of the new regulation.

The highly detailed rule defines and clarifies federal protections for tributaries as well as streams that are intermittent or perennial. For example, it specifically excludes from regulation ditches that have seasonal flows of water. Uncertainty over whether this type of ditch would be included under the Clean Water Act was a major point of contention with the regulation’s opponents.

The rule came under immediate fire from many industry groups and congressional Republicans representing agricultural states. For instance, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a powerful business lobby, says the rule will “significantly broaden federal regulatory jurisdiction over private activities on land and in waterways, wetlands, and drainage ditches.”

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), head of the House of Representatives’ Science, Space & Technology Committee, says the rule gives EPA “the power to restrict Americans from making decisions about their own property.”

Bills moving through Congress—including H.R. 1732 and S. 1140—would force EPA to scrap the new regulation and require the agency to rewrite the rule with broader input from stakeholders. In addition, the rule is expected to be challenged in federal court.

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
Chad Brick (May 28, 2015 10:08 PM)
For instance, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a powerful business lobby, says the rule will "“significantly broaden federal regulatory jurisdiction over private activities on land and in waterways, wetlands, and drainage ditches."

There is nothing such as "private activity" in waterways, wetlands, or drainage ditches, as neither water nor wildlife obey property lines. Your activities with respect to water inevitably affect your neighbors and anyone in the downstream watershed. Thus, regulation is morally justified.



Leave A Comment

*Required to comment