Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Pharmaceuticals

Two-Step Delivery Method Ups Cancer Drug’s Concentration In Tumors

Drug Delivery: Administering empty nanoparticles followed by a cancer drug could be a more effective therapy than giving the drug alone

by Stu Borman
January 20, 2016

THERAPEUTIC SEQUENCE
[+]Enlarge
Credit: Adapted from Scientific Reports
In a new two-step drug delivery strategy, empty nanoparticles that swell up at a tumor site first get delivered to mice with cancer followed by an untargeted version of the anticancer drug Taxol, which then accumulates inside the particles.
Schematic represents the concept of two-step delivery of, first, empty nanoparticles that swell up at a tumor site and, second, an untargeted version of the anticancer drug Taxol.
Credit: Adapted from Scientific Reports
In a new two-step drug delivery strategy, empty nanoparticles that swell up at a tumor site first get delivered to mice with cancer followed by an untargeted version of the anticancer drug Taxol, which then accumulates inside the particles.

Researchers report that cancer therapies involving drugs such as Taxol (paclitaxel) might be made more effective if clinicians did the two-step when administering them. The team found that a two-step procedure—delivering a tumor-localizing, drug-absorbing nanoparticle followed by the actual therapeutic—can increase the amount of drug that reaches tumor cells and the amount of time the drug acts on the cells (Scientific Reports 2016, DOI: 10.1038/srep18720).

In the study, Mark W. Grinstaff of Boston University, Yolonda Colson of Brigham & Women’s Hospital, and coworkers first administered a polymer-based nanoparticle to mice with tumors. This nanoparticle swells and becomes a gel in mildly acidic surroundings. Because cancer cells are more acidic than normal cells, when the rodents’ tumors took up the particles, the tiny particles expanded to 10 times their original size and became trapped.

Two days later, the researchers gave the mice Taxol, which concentrated inside the trapped nanoparticles because of its hydrophobicity. Taxol concentrations within the mouse tumors rose to about five times the level attained when researchers gave mice the drug alone. The drug also remained in the tumor longer, giving Taxol more time to kill cancer cells.

The researchers got the idea for the two-step strategy from previous studies in which scientists derivatized drugs with antibodies, nucleic acids, or other binding agents and then administered these conjugates separately from nanoparticles containing complementary binding agents or sites. The new approach is the first to match the chemical properties of drug and nanoparticle so they come together in the body without the need for derivatization.

The new two-step strategy is reminiscent of one-step nanomedicines—drug-laden nanoparticles that aim to deliver therapeutics in a targeted way, cutting down on drug side effects. In fact, when Grinstaff, Colson, and coworkers delivered nanoparticles preloaded with Taxol to mice with cancer, orders of magnitude more drug got to the tumors than was achieved with the two-step procedure. This might be expected because the drug doesn’t have to find the nanoparticles in the body.

But the new approach has a advantage: Nanomedicines preloaded with drugs would be considered new drug entities by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration and would have to pass a full series of clinical trials over many years to be approved. The polymer-based particles, on the other hand, are defined by FDA as medical devices because they do not have chemistry-based therapeutic activity. Taxol is also already FDA-approved. So the two-step strategy could minimize drug-approval complications and expenses and get to patients sooner, the Boston team says.

Cancer nanomedicine expert Joseph M. DeSimone of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, notes that the study “reports a first-of-its-kind result” because the two-step treatment requires neither selective binding interactions between drug and nanoparticle nor an activating event to make the drug start working, either or both of which were required in earlier drug-nanoparticle treatments. “The surprising result was that pretreating mice with a nontherapeutic nanoparticle that passively accumulates in the tumor tissues, followed by treatment with an untargeted drug, resulted in significantly higher tissue-specific drug delivery than treatment with drug alone,” DeSimone says.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.