Obama pick for U.S. Chemical Safety Board has strong industry ties | Chemical & Engineering News
Latest News
Web Date: November 28, 2016

Obama pick for U.S. Chemical Safety Board has strong industry ties

If confirmed, Meidl would bring CSB to full complement of members
Department: Government & Policy
Keywords: industrial safety, Chemical Safety Board, CSB, ACC, Obama, nominations
Credit: Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Photo of Rachel Meidl
Credit: Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Rachel A. Meidl was nominated by President Barack Obama earlier this month to serve on the U.S. Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board (CSB).

Meidl is currently deputy associate administrator for policy & programs in the Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHSMA) at the Department of Transportation, a position she has held for a year.

From 2012 to 2015, she was director of regulatory affairs for the American Chemistry Council, a chemical industry trade association.

As an industry advocate, Meidl was frequently at odds with CSB safety recommendations. For instance, in her comments on proposed regulations that had been advanced by CSB, she opposed application of inherently safer technologies and overhauls of federal regulations on process safety management and industrial facility risk management. She also argued against greater regulation of highly reactive chemicals.

CSB Chair Vanessa Sutherland is also a former official at PHMSA, a 600-employee agency that regulates the transportation of oil, natural gas, and other hazardous materials.

According to the White House, Meidl’s past experience includes several environmental health and safety positions at the University of California, San Diego. She began her career in 1997 as a contract manager and chemist at Clean Harbors Environmental Services.

If confirmed by the Senate, Meidl would bring the board to its full complement of five members for the first time since September 2011.

Her name is among 20 nominees for whom the president hopes to gain Senate approval in the waning days of his Administration.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
dean (November 30, 2016 4:58 PM)
Opposed greater regulation of highly reactive chemicals? Opposed inherently safer technologies? If the companies are not endangering lives it should be quite facile to comply.

Her stated opinions in this article are reckless and biased, in my opinion. Further, this is bad for business, hurting the companies that perform statistical analysis, quality control, verify compliance, and manufacture related items that enable compliance. The large chemical companies do not need the USCSB to assist in profit generation. Without the protections and regulations, these related companies - also chemistry industry companies - will suffer along with the planet. If the planet is harmed from her reckless ideas there could be fewer consumers left and not even big chemical companies desire such.

Just exactly what did she do at PHSMA? Did she favor large banks or the people and planet with the Dakota Access Pipeline? Obviously DAP is only for profit for some as alternate methods are available and fracked petrol is not needed either.

This is a SAFETY board, not a maximize profit- destroy the environment- harm chemical workers- board.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment