Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



U.S. court backs EPA’s delay of chlorpyrifos ban

Decision is a victory for the Trump Administration

by Britt E. Erickson
July 20, 2017 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 95, ISSUE 30

Credit: Shutterstock
Chlorpyrifos is considered critical for use against ants in California’s citrus industry.
Credit: Shutterstock
Chlorpyrifos is considered critical for use against ants in California’s citrus industry.

A federal appeals court has let stand the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s controversial decision to allow continued use of the pesticide chlorpyrifos, which is linked to neurotoxic effects.

The July 18 decision is a win for the Trump Administration, which has put off finalizing an Obama EPA proposal to ban chlorpyrifos on food crops.

In 2016, EPA said that combined exposure to chlorpyrifos through food and drinking water in the U.S. is expected to exceed the agency’s safety standard. At the time, EPA cited concerns about neurotoxicity from exposure to the organophosphate insecticide.

The agency now claims “the science addressing neurodevelopmental effects remains unresolved.” EPA says it will continue evaluating the risks of chlorpyrifos until 2022.

In the case, environmental groups asserted that EPA’s March denial of their petition to ban the pesticide broke federal law. The agency has made “no new safety findings” and no “final determination as to whether chlorpyrifos food tolerances must be revoked,” they argued.

The court said it could focus only on the timing of EPA’s response to the petition, not the substance of that response, determining that the agency’s actions were legal. The environmental groups’ next step is to file objections with EPA about the petition’s denial, the court said.

The environmental groups, along with some state attorneys general, have already filed that formal request with EPA, asking the agency to reconsider the proposed chlorpyrifos ban. The agency has not responded. The groups are also involved in another court case related to the merits of EPA’s decision to delay the planned ban.

“EPA scientists have said for more than two years that this pesticide is unsafe, particularly to children. Any delay in banning this toxic chemical is a tragedy for families and farmworkers,” says Patti Goldman, managing attorney for Earthjustice, one of the environmental groups involved in the suits.

Dow AgroSciences, which makes chlorpyrifos, maintains that use of the pesticide offers “wide margins of protection for human health and safety.” The company claims that the chemical is used in about 100 countries to protect more than 50 crops.



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Lynne (July 22, 2017 10:35 PM)
Rather like the evil queen in Snow White who peddles the poison apple.....Perhaps the federal appeals court that condoned the continued use of this toxic pesticide should have used the following test prior to making their determination: Place a bowl of oranges treated with this pesticide in front of the CEO of Dow AgroSciences and ask him to eat one himself and feed another one to his wife and/or children. Any refusal on the part of the CEO to do so would result in this chemical being banned for use in this country, and prevented from being distributed to other world nations. Then again, the CEO of Dow AgroSciences and his family probably eats only organic, GMO-free food.....
Jenene Skrupky (July 27, 2017 10:26 AM)
And that's why I buy ORGANIC whenever possible. Also, what about that YUGE donation that Dow chemical made to Trump?
Quid Pro Quo or WHAT!!!

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment