Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



Dow and Bayer sued for polluting university campus

West Virginia State University charges the two chemical firms poisoned groundwater with likely carcinogens

by Marc S. Reisch
May 1, 2017

Credit: West Virginia State University
West Virginia State University students attend class outside on campus.

In a lawsuit, West Virginia State University is accusing Dow Chemical and Bayer of polluting the groundwater under its campus with three likely carcinogens: 1,4-dioxane, 1,2-dichloroethane, and chloroform.

While the suit, filed on April 27 in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, places no dollar value on a remedy, it seeks cleanup as well as compensatory and punitive damages, including a “national public relations program” to restore the school’s reputation.

Dow operates the nearby Institute Industrial Park, where Bayer is a tenant. Dow “must be held accountable for the damage it has done to our property and reputation,” university President Anthony L. Jenkins says.

The industrial park was the site of a methyl isocyanate plant once owned by Bayer and Union Carbide, now a subsidiary of Dow. Although the plant closed several years ago, for years, Institute, W.Va., residents worried about a leak, mindful of the 1984 accident at a similar Union Carbide facility in India that killed thousands.

In announcing the lawsuit, the university acknowledges that it does not use the groundwater on campus. It says the contamination “does not pose a current health risk to anyone on campus,” adding that “outside experts have concluded that the available evidence does not indicate a threat to human health from [the] contaminants.”

Dow, pointing to the university’s acknowledgement of a lack of health concern, says “every reason exists allowing the university to use the property as they originally intended.” It adds that it has met, and will continue to meet, its remediation commitments “with oversight from EPA and the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection.”

Bayer tells C&EN that it “will be looking into this matter carefully.” The firm adds that it “takes its environmental obligations seriously.”



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Bruce Burton (May 3, 2017 5:29 PM)
Seriously! Is C&EN no longer hiring editors, or fair writers? The paragraph with "that killed thousands" in bold type is not only irrelevant to the current issue but belies a complete lack of knowledge about the chemistry and politics of the event it cites. That's shameful.
Jyllian Kemsley (May 8, 2017 1:20 PM)
The reason that the text is in bold is because it's linked to C&EN's 2004 story, "Twenty Years After Bhopal," for you to read more about the incident if you wish.
Satinath Sarangi (May 4, 2017 3:16 AM)
Sorry but i find Bruce Burton's comments totally uncalled for. The death of several thousands of Bhopalis and chronic illness of hundreds of thousands from MIC exposure in Bhopal, India underlines the highly toxic nature of MIC and the basis of fear among neighbourhood residents in Institute, West Virginia. Union Carbide's toxic legacy in Bhopal includes contamination of groundwater in and around the abandoned factory site. As 100% owner of Union Carbide, Dow Chemical is officially held liable by the Indian government for past pollution by Union Carbide but Dow Chemical is yet to take the first step towards clean up in Bhopal in the last sixteen years.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment