Advertisement
Grab your lab coat. Let's get started
Welcome!
Welcome!
Create an account below to get 6 C&EN articles per month, receive newsletters and more - all free.
It seems this is your first time logging in online. Please enter the following information to continue.
As an ACS member you automatically get access to this site. All we need is few more details to create your reading experience.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Policy
U.S. Judge Rules Against Tate & Lyle
September 29, 2008
| A version of this story appeared in
Volume 86, Issue 39
A U.S. International Trade Commission administrative law judge has issued a preliminary ruling that China's Niutang Chemical hasn't violated Tate & Lyle's patents to manufacture the sweetener sucralose. ITC still must review the judge's conclusions before it makes a final decision, expected by January 2009. Tate & Lyle says it intends to appeal the judge's decision before the full six-person ITC commission. Tate & Lyle initiated the complaint against Niutang and other Chinese sucralose makers and importers in April 2007.
The power is now in your (nitrile gloved) hands
Sign up for a free account to get more articles. Or choose the ACS option that’s right for you.
Already have an ACS ID? Log in
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter