ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The tone of the article on President Barack Obama’s 2013 budget proposal, “Affirming Science,” seems to be based on the premise that chemists care only about the size and number of research grants that will be up for grabs (C&EN, Feb. 27, page 38). Is this what passes for rationality in Washington, D.C.?
Chemists and others are talking more and more about the need for sustainability. Surely, chemists who have been educated to think analytically can grasp the concept that the politicians running the government cannot sustain year after year of spending more than the government takes in. Currently, 40% of the federal budget has to be borrowed every year. Even if every dollar of every millionaire and billionaire were confiscated by the Administration, it would not keep the federal government running for more than a year.
Business as usual will not keep working. It is time for serious people to be serious.
By Donald B. Boyd
Indianapolis
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter