Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

Don’t Forget R744

February 6, 2012 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 90, Issue 6

Cheryl Hogue’s Government & Policy article “Replacing the Replacements” failed to mention the possible use of CO2 (aka R744) as a replacement for hydrofluorocarbons such as R134a (C&EN, Dec. 5, 2011, page 31). R744 does not deplete stratospheric ozone and has a global-warming potential (GWP) of 1 (by definition), a factor of 4–7 times less than the GWPs of the HFC replacement candidates (HFC-1234yf, HFC-1234ze, and HFC-1233zd) discussed in the article.

The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) has classified R744 into safety group A1, the safest classification for both toxicity (A) and flammability (1). As mentioned in the article, different refrigerants will likely emerge as the best solution for different applications, but any discussion of HFC replacements certainly should include R744 as an attractive candidate for many applications.

By Matthew Eisaman
Port Jefferson, N.Y.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.