ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
EPA is mulling over whether or how it should change its Risk Management Plan (RMP) rule designed to prevent accidental releases of harmful chemicals and to mitigate the severity of releases that do occur. EPA is seeking public input on whether it should add reactive and explosive substances, including ammonium nitrate, to the list of chemicals covered by the RMP rule. Ammonium nitrate used in fertilizer was involved in the 2013 explosion and fire at a fertilizer depot in West, Texas, that killed 15 people. The agency is also asking for comments about the advantages and disadvantages of the “safety case” approach to replace its RMP and OSHA’s process safety regulations. The safety case approach, used in several industrialized countries, requires companies and unions to work with regulators to develop regulatory requirements.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter