ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Almost two dozen minerals required for new and emerging technologies are at risk of supply shortages, according to a new study of the US manufacturing sector (Sci. Adv. 2020, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay8647). The minerals are used in alloys, batteries, catalysts, ceramics, and other applications. A research team led by Nedal T. Nassar of the US Geological Survey’s National Minerals Information Center developed a model to look at three factors that put mineral supplies at risk: US manufacturers’ dependence on foreign supplies, the chance of a foreign supply disruption, and manufacturers’ ability to continue working through a disruption. After examining the use of 52 minerals from 2007 to 2016, the authors found the greatest risk of a supply disruption for 23 minerals, including rare-earth elements, platinum-group elements, cobalt, niobium, tantalum, and tungsten. While federal policies are driven by year-to-year supply fluctuations, the researchers found that these 23 minerals were at risk consistently throughout the time period they studied. Now that these minerals have been identified as high risk, “it is then important to determine how best to reduce that risk for that commodity,” they say.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X