Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



Pentadiamond outshines the original

A theoretical material made of carbon pentagons is lighter and stiffer than a standard diamond

by Sam Lemonick
July 6, 2020 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 98, ISSUE 26


Credit: Adapted from Physical Review Letters
In a pentadiamond, some carbons (black) are bonded to four other atoms, while others (gray) are bonded to three.

Diamonds may be forever, but that doesn’t mean they’re the only game in town. Researchers Yasumaru Fujii, Mina Maruyama, and colleagues at the University of Tsukuba have made computer models of a new 3-D carbon structure they call pentadiamond whose properties promise to outshine those of the original material (Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.016001). Unlike a typical diamond, in which every carbon is bonded to four other carbons, a pentadiamond has a mix of carbons bound to three and four other carbons. These form a network of five-membered carbon rings—hence the name pentadiamond. Using density functional theory calculations, the scientists calculated that, if it can be made, a pentadiamond should be stiffer than a standard diamond. They also predict it has better semiconductor properties than diamonds, possibly making it useful in electronics, like displays. And because a pentadiamond’s crystal structure has larger cavities than a standard diamond's, the new material should be about one-third lighter. The researchers did not attempt to make a pentadiamond in the lab, but they suggest it could be done using nickel-catalyzed reactions between ring-bearing molecules.



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Mark Penick (July 8, 2020 4:01 PM)
According to what I have read an all C-12 diamond has higher thermal conductivity than a diamond with natural abundance C-13. Is that true for this structure as well?
Luiz Felipe Pereira (July 11, 2020 8:13 PM)
If the material is isotopicaly pure it should indeed have a higher thermal conductivity.
William Rubin (July 10, 2020 11:00 AM)
Sounds net but until you've made it, it means nothing.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment