ADVERTISEMENT
4 /5 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Litigation

U.S. class-action case targets nine PFAS makers

Suit seeks creation of science panel to review evidence of health harm

by Cheryl Hogue
October 10, 2018 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 96, ISSUE 41

 

09641-buscon4-pfas.jpg
Credit: Shutterstock
The lead plaintiff in the class-action suit is a firefighter whose protective gear contains per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances.

A firefighter is leading a class-action suit against nine manufacturers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs).

The defendants named in the suit are 3M, Archroma, Arkema, Asahi Glass, Chemours, Daikin, Dyneon, DuPont (now officially DowDuPont), and Solvay.

The proposed class encompasses residents of the U.S. who have a detectable level of PFASs in their blood serum and claim they are injured from this exposure. The companies did not get plaintiffs’ permission before exposing them to PFASs, the suit says.

Lead plaintiff Kevin D. Hardwick has worked as firefighter for more than 40 years, according to the complaint. Hardwick’s exposure stems in part from his firefighting gear, which is coated or treated with PFASs, as well as his use of firefighting foams containing these substances.

The suit, filed Oct. 4 in federal trial court in Ohio, seeks the creation of a panel of scientific experts that would evaluate evidence and determine any probable link between PFAS exposure and human health problems.

This request is fashioned after one in a 2004 class-action settlement with DuPont regarding exposure to one PFAS, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), that was released from a plant near Parkersburg, W.Va. That science panel found probable links between PFOA and several health problems.

In 2017, DuPont and its spin-off Chemours agreed to pay $670 million to settle 3,550 PFOA-related personal injury suits in Ohio and West Virginia.

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
lana (Fri Oct 12 10:57:34 EDT 2018)
If I recall correctly, the fluorinated compounds used to waterproof garments are VERY different from the fluorinated substances used in surfactants for firefighting foams, and both are not the PFOA that the Parkersburg panel suggested might have health impacts.
Is this new case claiming harm from residual PFOA...or 'all that 'fluorinated" stuff'?

I seem to recall reading that firefighters have pretty high cancer rates, and documented occupational risk factors (shift work, inhaled combustion products etc)...even before the widespread use of fluorinated foams or water-repellents.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment