Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Policy

House Appropriations Leader Urges Weapons Lab Changes

August 23, 2004 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 82, Issue 34

Strong criticism of the Department of Energy's weapons labs was voiced by the head of the House Appropriations subcommittee that controls the labs' budget during a recent presentation before a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) panel. Although supporting the technical skills and dedication of lab staff, Rep. David L. Hobson (R-Ohio) said that his visits to DOE labs had shown him the "ultimate in white-collar welfare." The visits, he continued, were "like stepping back in a time capsule" with business practices "two decades behind the times." He warned that the "glory days" of weapons complex spending were over and said he strongly opposed funding for new nuclear weapons research programs proposed by the Bush Administration. He stressed, however, his continued support for the weapons stockpile maintenance program but at much reduced levels. He also backed modernization of the weapons complex, but modernization, he said, should reflect a limited role for nuclear weapons in a post-Cold War world. "We have too many unmet conventional defense needs in the present day to afford spending more than $6 billion annually to support a large and antiquated nuclear weapons complex," he said. He urged a reassessment of the role of the labs and nuclear weapons in today's world and expressed doubt that a nuclear stockpile is useful against the U.S.'s new foes. DOE officials also speaking before the NAS committee took issue with Hobson's characterization of the labs and mission.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.