Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Policy

Chemical Exposure Study Suspended

Panel will review EPA study for ethical, conflict-of-interest concerns

by BETTE HILEMAN
November 15, 2004 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 82, Issue 46

 

ON HOLD
[+]Enlarge
Credit: PHOTODISC
Suspended study was intended to monitor children's exposure to chemicals at home.
Credit: PHOTODISC
Suspended study was intended to monitor children's exposure to chemicals at home.

EPA has suspended, until next spring at the earliest, a controversial study that was to try to discover how pesticides and certain other common household chemicals get into children's blood.

The agency has decided to ask a group of independent experts to reexamine the study design, which has already been reviewed by four panels.

The chemicals to be measured include pesticides, phthalates, brominated diphenyl ethers (flame retardants), and perfluorinated chemicals. In October, the American Chemistry Council (ACC) contributed about $2 million to support the $9 million study, allowing the monitored chemicals to be expanded beyond pesticides (C&EN, Oct. 18, page 10).

According to the original design, the research was to involve 60 children from birth to three years of age, all from Duval County, Fla. Each participating family was to receive up to $970 and a video camcorder. The original brochure and fact sheet on EPA's website both stated that to be selected, participants "must spray or have sprayed pesticides" inside their homes routinely during the two-year study period. After press reports made an issue of this, however, EPA removed almost all information about the study from the brochure and changed the fact sheet to read, "You must maintain your normal pesticide or nonpesticide use patterns for your household."

Rank-and-file EPA scientists around the U.S. questioned the study, saying low-income families might consent to pesticide use because of the money involved, and that accepting industry funding could compromise EPA's independence. They also criticized the study design for not requiring that participating families be informed of potential dangers of pesticide use.

In a statement, ACC says it "continues to strongly support the study because of the great importance of increasing understanding of the exposures of young children to pesticides and other chemicals."

Advertisement

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.