Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Policy

Special masters

July 3, 2006 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 84, Issue 27

Regarding the story "Judging Science" (C&EN, Feb. 27, page 36), the use of special masters to serve as technical experts to a court is time-honored under the Federal Rules for Civil Procedure (FRCP 74). I had the honor of serving as special master in USA v. Hardage, a toxic-tort litigation some years ago. I was not competing with the parties' experts; rather, I was an officer of the court who was considered knowledgeable or expert in relevant areas and endeavored to ask appropriate questions to expedite discovery. It seemed to work.

Alex Danzberger
Bristol, R.I.

CORRECTION

June 5, page 4: A*STAR was misidentified as the Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology. It is the Agency for Science, Technology & Research. The Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology is one of the research institutes under A*STAR.

June 5, page 28: The formation of the second compound should be 2-bromo-5-fluorobenzonitrile.

June 5, page 33: Allovectin-7 was incorrectly identified as a plasma-lipid complex. It is a plasmid-lipid complex.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.