ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
On Sept. 20, the Department of Energy released a strategic plan outlining technological approaches to curb emissions of greenhouse gases. The plan essentially updates a draft plan released last year. It was unveiled at a hearing of the House Science Subcommittee on Energy and elicited widespread criticism from subcommittee members and most of the witnesses. Rep. Judy Biggert (R-Ill.), chair of the subcommittee, expressed disappointment that the plan sets no timelines for deployment of the technologies and does not assess their relative impact on atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Judith M. Greenwald of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change said the plan does not provide a path to stabilizing concentrations of greenhouse gases. Also, a new report from the Congressional Budget Office says relying exclusively on R&D funding is not an effective strategy for curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Placing a cap or tax on emissions would be a far more cost-effective approach, the report concludes.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter