Advertisement
Grab your lab coat. Let's get started
Welcome!
Welcome!
Create an account below to get 6 C&EN articles per month, receive newsletters and more - all free.
It seems this is your first time logging in online. Please enter the following information to continue.
As an ACS member you automatically get access to this site. All we need is few more details to create your reading experience.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Environment
Paint Makers Still On The Hook
March 5, 2007
| A version of this story appeared in
Volume 85, Issue 10
A Rhode Island superior court judge has ruled that paint makers must clean up lead paint contamination in more than 240,000 homes and public buildings in the state. He denied an appeal from Sherwin-Williams, NL Industries, and Lyondell Chemicals' Millennium unit to set aside a year-old jury verdict holding them responsible for as much as $1 billion in remediation costs. The paint makers have not said whether they will appeal. The judge says he will appoint a special master to help decide whether the paint firms must remove or cover over the lead paint.
The power is now in your (nitrile gloved) hands
Sign up for a free account to get more articles. Or choose the ACS option that’s right for you.
Already have an ACS ID? Log in
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X