ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The White House last week abandoned its controversial attempt to set government-wide standards for risk assessments. Instead, its Office of Management & Budget (OMB) and Office of Science & Technology Policy reaffirmed principles established during the Clinton Administration for assessing and managing risks. A memo distributed to heads of federal agencies on Sept. 19 says the White House has decided not to finalize an OMB bulletin on risk assessment policy proposed in 2006. A National Research Council report released earlier this year said the proposal was "fundamentally flawed" and should be scrapped (C&EN, Jan. 29, page 32). The new White House memo describes how the Clinton Administration's risk analysis principles fit in with Bush Administration regulatory directives on peer review, quality of information produced by the government, and the science and economic documents used to justify new regulations, says Rick Melberth, director of regulatory policy for the public interest group OMB Watch. Sally Katzen, who headed OMB's Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs during the Clinton Administration and oversaw development of the 1995 risk analysis principles, points out that the new memo lacks the caveats accompanying the originals, saying the principles were aspirational and not prescriptive for agencies.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter