Eating As An Environmentalist | July 28, 2008 Issue - Vol. 86 Issue 30 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 86 Issue 30 | p. 69 | Insights
Issue Date: July 28, 2008

Eating As An Environmentalist

What you eat matters more than how far it traveled
Department: Science & Technology | Collection: Climate Change
News Channels: Environmental SCENE
Farmers' markets can help people be vegetarian and eat locally.
Credit: Shutterstock
8630insights_marketcxd_opt
 
Farmers' markets can help people be vegetarian and eat locally.
Credit: Shutterstock

PEOPLE HIGHLIGHT the extensively transported nature of our food supply with the concept of "food miles." In the U.S., food travels an average of 1,500 miles, usually by truck, to reach the dinner plate. "Locavores" advocate eating only food produced much closer than a half-continent's trip away. But if climate impact is the main driver behind their decision, locavores may be taking the wrong approach.

According to a study by research assistant professor Christopher L. Weber and associate professor H. Scott Matthews, both in the department of civil and environmental engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, transportation and food miles make a relatively minor contribution to the total climate impact of the American diet (Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 3508). By their calculation, transportation overall reflects only 11% of food-related greenhouse gas emissions, with the final distribution from producer to retailer accounting for 4%. Instead, it's pollution associated with production that constitute the major source of food-related greenhouse gas emissions, and those emissions vary by type of food.

Looking at the different food categories, red meat is by far the biggest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, thanks to the inefficient conversion of plant energy into animal-based energy. Plus, there are the methane emissions produced by ruminant animals such as cattle, sheep, and goats. Those same methane emissions catapult dairy products past poultry and fish to a surprise second-place on the greenhouse gas list.

When people change the types of food they eat, they wield a bigger environmental impact than they could by changing the origin or the distance their food travels. So people will reduce the climate effects of their diet far more by switching to a vegetarian diet than by becoming even an extreme locavore. "Our study shows definitively that if you are trying to reduce the greenhouse gas impacts of your food consumption, 'buying local' should be secondary to changing your diet," Matthews says.

What does that mean for someone like me? I've been a dairy- and egg-eating vegetarian since 1997. The initial reason for that dietary sea change was a knee-jerk response to a sausage-filled trip to Germany. I also wanted to prove to myself that I could actually do it. If I were in the same situation today, I hope that the environmental impact of the meat eater's diet would play a role in my decision.

Therefore, the study by Matthews and Weber suggests that I made my biggest contribution to the cause when I became a vegetarian. If I want to make a significant impact from this point, the study suggests I have to give up dairy products as well.

Which brings me back to eating locally. Other than becoming a vegan, worrying about food miles is just about the only way to decrease the environmental impact of my diet.

Novelist Barbara Kingsolver, trained in environmental science and a frequent writer of environmental essays, is among the more prominent people who have committed themselves to eating locally. She chronicles her family's one-year experiment in the book "Animal, Vegetable, Miracle."

Kingsolver acknowledges that eating locally is not easy—even for people living on a farm. Her family grows a large garden, she raises heirloom turkeys, and her younger daughter, Lily, keeps a flock of egg-laying chickens. Each family member was allowed one nonlocal item, such as coffee, as long as he or she agreed to research ways to obtain it that were environmentally responsible and fair to the producers.

Kingsolver's book challenges readers to be more aware of the food they eat. Not everybody has the luxury—if it can be called that—of living on a farm, but most people have access to one of the many farmers' markets that have cropped up around the country.

Eating locally might not offer quite the climate payoff that people thought, but there may be other reasons for eating locally. There's something to be said for simply knowing where your food comes from. The recent Salmonella scare in tomatoes and jalapeño peppers certainly highlights that.

Matthews notes that he and Weber have taken heat from people who buy locally produced food. "Nowhere in our paper do we say people should stop doing those things," Matthews says. "Supporting locally grown produce is a great way to make an economic and personal contribution to improving" one's region, he adds.

But food miles are only part of the whole equation. "People should not be focused in on food miles or any other metric without broadly understanding the sources of their impact, CO2 or otherwise," Matthews says. "In general, the average household's activities that lead to the most greenhouse gas emissions are heating/cooling their residence and transportation. Food is in general third or fourth."

All of this encourages me to be more mindful of my own food-purchasing habits and the provenance of my food. I'm taking baby steps, but I still have a long way to go. In the winter, I still buy food that has made the long journey from warmer climes, but in the summer, I buy my produce at my local farmers' markets—and I ride my bicycle to get there.

 

Views expressed on this page are those of the author and not necessarily those of ACS.

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment