Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Safety

OSHA Combustible Dust Rule Needed

August 4, 2008 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 86, Issue 31

The explosion and fire at a sugar refinery on Feb. 7, the latest in a series of fatal dust accidents in recent years, dramatically illustrates the need for new federal safety regulations, congressional Democrats say. "OSHA has failed to respond proactively," Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Employment & Workplace Safety, declared last week at a hearing that examined the blast at the Imperial Sugar plant in Port Wentworth, Ga. That explosion claimed the lives of 13 workers and hospitalized 40 others (C&EN, Feb. 18, page 5). OSHA has proposed nearly $9 million in penalties against Imperial for "willful and egregious" safety violations. Criminal charges are also possible. Murray and other Democrats on the panel said regulations are needed to protect workers from combustible dust hazards. A bill passed by the House in April would force OSHA to adopt new standards specifically targeting dust. But OSHA Administrator Edwin G. Foulke Jr. told lawmakers that it "wouldn't have mattered if we had a combustible dust standard," because the company knowingly placed its employees "in an extremely dangerous work environment." Imperial Sugar denies the allegation and plans to contest OSHA's citations and proposed penalties.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.