ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The Supreme Court has agreed to determine whether business methods, such as processes and procedures, qualify for patent protection. The justices agreed to review an October ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that narrowed the class of patentable inventions to those "tied to a particular machine or apparatus" or transforming "a particular article into a different state or thing." The appeals court ruled that the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office was correct in refusing to allow Bernard L. Bilski and Rand Warsaw's company to patent a method for hedging weather-based risk in commodities trading because it was too abstract. "The Bilski decision has significant implications on the patentability of biotechnology and life science inventions" because it introduces uncertainty about what chemical and biological processes might still be patentable, says Roque El-Hayek, an associate at the law firm Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter