ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Greenpeace activists descended on Illinois, Ohio, Missouri, and more than a dozen other states earlier this month in an effort to build support for legislation that could force thousands of chemical plants to switch to less hazardous processes—a requirement the industry strongly opposes as costly and unnecessary. When lawmakers return to Washington, D.C., in September, the House Energy & Commerce Committee plans to vote on two bills (H.R. 2868 and H.R. 3258) designed to lessen the consequences of a terrorist attack on a chemical facility. The Department of Homeland Security says there are 6,300 “high risk” chemical facilities in the U.S. More than 100 million Americans live in “vulnerability zones” surrounding just 300 of these facilities, according to Greenpeace. “No one believes that determined terrorists will be stopped by fence-line security,” Greenpeace Field Organizer Hannah Allison remarked at a press conference in North St. Louis. “The only way to eliminate the consequences of an attack is to convert plants to safer chemicals or processes.”
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter