ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
As the global economy continues to deteriorate, Eastman Chemical plans to whack another $100 million off annual expenses. The new cost-saving effort is in addition to a plan the firm outlined barely three months ago that also aimed to cut expenses by $100 million.
More Online
Stay current on the chemical industry's responses to changing economic conditions by visiting www.cen-online.org/economy.
In the latest round, Eastman plans to eliminate up to 300 jobs globally, about 3% of its workforce, within the next four to six weeks. The company is also cutting salaries of non-union U.S. employees by 5% at the end of this month, and it expects to make "equivalent cost reductions" at unionized sites and locations outside the U.S.??
Other actions include reducing non-critical maintenance costs, logistics costs, and discretionary spending. Capital expenditures previously budgeted for this year at $375 million—already more than 40% below the 2008 level—will instead come in between $300 million and $350 million, the firm says.
"The actions we are taking to reduce costs position us to better weather the storm," explains CEO Brian Ferguson. To account for them, the firm plans to take a $30 million before-tax charge against first-quarter earnings.
Back in December Eastman laid out plans to reduce a number of contract and management jobs, freeze salaries, and eliminate overtime. At the time, Ferguson said he believed Eastman was "well positioned to weather this current economic crisis." But now, he says, the "severity of the current economic environment" has forced the company to further reduce costs.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter