ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
For years cyclobutadiene has been called the “Mona Lisa of organic chemistry” because the seemingly inscrutable chemical resisted efforts to reveal its crystal structure, despite a deceivingly simple molecular formula. Cyclobutadiene is now also a source of controversy because some researchers are calling into question the first reported X-ray crystal structure of the molecule, which was published in a research paper in Science in July (C&EN, July 19, page 33). Mihail Barboiu and colleagues at the European Institute of Membranes, in Montpellier, France, described how they trapped 4,6-dimethyl-α-pyrone in a guanidinium-sulfonate-calixarene network and then zapped crystals of the complex repeatedly with ultraviolet light to convert the precursor pyrone into CO2 and 1,3-dimethylcyclobutadiene. In separate peer-reviewed technical comments in Science, David Scheschkewitz of Imperial College London and a group of researchers led by Igor V. Alabugin of Florida State University argue that Barboiu and colleagues didn’t make 1,3-dimethylcyclobutadiene but instead crystallized 4,6-dimethyl-β-lactone, an intermediate of the photolysis reaction (DOI: 10.1126/science.1195752; 10.1126/sci ence.1196188). Barboiu and colleagues stand by their initial interpretation of the crystallography data in a response also published in Science (DOI: 10.1126/sci ence.1195846).
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X