ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
At a Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) hearing last week, offshore oil drilling experts from Norway, Australia, and the U.K. recommended that the U.S. shift to a nonprescriptive approach to regulate ocean drilling operations, a strategy the countries’ regulators use. The experts described an agreement between drilling companies and regulators, in which each company lays out a plan for how drilling must safely take place and each nation’s regulators approve and oversee implementation of the company plan. The countries moved to this “safety case” approach after huge offshore drilling accidents in their regions. The speakers underscored the need to adequately fund such a program—either with government money or a levy on companies—and to gain support from regulated oil companies. The daylong hearing was the latest event in CSB’s investigation of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion. CSB has interviewed more than 30 witnesses and is taking part in the Department of the Interior and the Coast Guard’s forensic examination of the failed blowout preventer, which should be completed in February 2011.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X