ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Nanomaterials

Why Quantum Dots Blink

Study uncovers two mechanisms that control spontaneous emission fluctuations

by Mitch Jacoby
December 1, 2011

QUANTUM
[+]Enlarge
Credit: Victor I. Klimov/LANL
By applying a fluorescence spectroscopy technique to CdSe-CdS core-shell nanocrystals (depicted in model), researchers at Los Alamos have uncovered the blinking mechanisms that control light emission from the particles.
20111201lnp1-coreshell.jpg
Credit: Victor I. Klimov/LANL
By applying a fluorescence spectroscopy technique to CdSe-CdS core-shell nanocrystals (depicted in model), researchers at Los Alamos have uncovered the blinking mechanisms that control light emission from the particles.

Random fluctuations in light emission from semiconductor nanocrystals, also known as quantum dots, are driven by two photoluminescence mechanisms, according to researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The findings, which were revealed by a new spectro-electrochemical technique, uncover the causes of the “blinking,” a well-known phenomenon that limits the stability of quantum dot-based devices such as solar cells and light-emitting diodes.

BLINK
[+]Enlarge
Credit: Victor I. Klimov/LANL
Galland and coworkers probed the blinking mechansim with a novel spectro-electrochemical technique.
20111201lnp1-qdot.jpg
Credit: Victor I. Klimov/LANL
Galland and coworkers probed the blinking mechansim with a novel spectro-electrochemical technique.
[+]Enlarge
Credit: Mitch Jacoby/C&EN
Klimov
20111201lnp1-Klimov.jpg
Credit: Mitch Jacoby/C&EN
Klimov

In addition to providing a foundation for developing a comprehensive theoretical model of this phenomenon, the study details an electrochemical method for suppressing this detrimental effect. The findings were presented at the Materials Research Society meeting in Boston on Wednesday, Nov. 30, and have just been published in Nature (DOI: 10.1038/nature10569).

As methods to synthesize nanocrystals with well-controlled compositions and structures have abounded in recent years, the variety of applications that exploit nanocrystals’ optical and electronic properties have grown too. The list includes photovoltaic cells and other energy conversion devices, diodes, lasers, and other specialized light emitters. Quantum dots are also used for labeling and tracking cells and in other bioimaging applications.

All of these uses for quantum dots are adversely affected by their tendency to blink. The underlying causes of that process have been the subject of lively debate because researchers have been unable to design telltale experiments that could pinpoint the origins of the blinking.

Now, Christophe Galland, Victor I. Klimov, and coworkers at Los Alamos have done just that.

“We’ve developed a new spectro-electrochemical technique that allows us to study the effect of controlled charge injection on the intensity and lifetime of light emission from quantum dots,” Klimov said at the MRS meeting.

To get that information, the team probed the photoluminescence behavior of single quantum dots in solution by exciting the sample with a pulsed laser while they manipulated the charge state of the particles in a working electrochemical cell. For example, they gradually made the particles—CdSe-CdS core-shell nanocrystals—negatively charged (injected with electrons) by applying an increasingly negative potential to the solution, and then they analyzed the light emitted from the particles via microspectroscopy techniques.

By applying those methods to particles with a narrow range of shell thicknesses, the team determined that blinking is caused by two processes. One process results from light-driven charging and discharging of the nanocrystal core. After being irradiated, excited neutral quantum dots relax by emitting photons, which makes the particles appear bright. Charged particles appear dark because they relax by ejecting electrons in a process known as Auger electron emission.

“The majority of quantum dots, however, display blinking due to a different mechanism,” Klimov said. That process is based on charging and discharging of surface electron traps. If these traps are unoccupied, they can intercept energetic or “hot” electrons, thereby preventing the electrons from relaxing to a state that would otherwise lead to photon emission and from appearing bright.

ON AND OFF
Credit: Victor I. Klimov, LANL
A microscopy method catches individual nanocrystals (quantum dots) of CdSe randomly fluctuating in emission intensity. Los Alamos researchers have now uncovered the fundamental causes of this “blinking” phenomenon.

Both blinking mechanisms can be controlled electrochemically, Klimov said, and applying an appropriate potential can completely suppress blinking.

“This study resolves the long-standing controversy concerning the origin of photoluminescence blinking,” says Alexander A. Efros, a Naval Research Laboratory theoretician who specializes in quantum dot physics. The team showed that in addition to a “conventional” charging-discharging mechanism, a second process must be going on, he explains. “The interception mechanism that they propose is the only plausible explanation of these observations,” Efros says.

The Los Alamos team also showed that in nanocrystals with a thick shell, the interception mechanism is suppressed. That finding, Efros adds, “paves the way to designing nanostructures that will combine blinking suppression with extremely high photoluminescence yields.”

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
Aziel (December 6, 2011 4:12 PM)
Is not a new technique......applied bias on TCSPC has been done before. For example, Kamat and co-workers.
Debasis Bera (December 14, 2011 1:38 AM)
Good news is there is a progress made towards resolving this long-standing blinking issue. The mechanism 'Auger-assisted ionization process' is previously speculated. There was no concrete proof. This paper would further encourage to investgate.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment