ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
More than two years after the Deepwater Horizon oil-rig disaster, little is known about the effects of dispersants applied below the surface of water, says a report by congressional investigators. Also, information is limited about the effectiveness of dispersants in chilly Arctic waters, where much oil drilling occurs, says the Government Accountability Office report (GAO-12-585). “It’s stunning how little we know about the effect of dispersants just two years after using millions of gallons in the Gulf of Mexico” in response to the Deepwater Horizon explosion, says Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.), who requested the report along with Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.). “And whatever lessons we learned from the Gulf of Mexico are probably useless in the Arctic,” says Miller, the top Democrat on an environmental subcommittee of the House of Representatives Science, Space & Technology Committee. The report recommends that the federal Interagency Coordinating Committee on Oil Pollution Research ensure that priority is given to research on subsurface and Arctic applications of dispersants.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter