Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Analytical Chemistry

Method Cleans Up Cluttered Spectra

Biological NMR: A new way to remove unwanted signals could make analyzing complex biological samples easier

by Christine Herman
January 2, 2012

Structured Subtraction
[+]Enlarge
Credit: Anal. Chem
The typical approach to removing unwanted NMR signals, such as glucose peaks, from spectra (top) involves subtracting the spectrum of pure glucose (red) from the spectrum of a complex sample (blue). Unfortunately, it only removes a fraction of the unwanted signals, leaving behind difficult-to-interpret data (green). The “add to subtract” approach (bottom) yields a 98% reduction in glucose signals.
A schematic demonstrating “add to subtract” approach to eliminating glucose NMR signals.
Credit: Anal. Chem
The typical approach to removing unwanted NMR signals, such as glucose peaks, from spectra (top) involves subtracting the spectrum of pure glucose (red) from the spectrum of a complex sample (blue). Unfortunately, it only removes a fraction of the unwanted signals, leaving behind difficult-to-interpret data (green). The “add to subtract” approach (bottom) yields a 98% reduction in glucose signals.

When researchers use nuclear magnetic resonance to analyze the contents of biological samples, signals from a few compounds often swamp out the rest. A new method suppresses the unwanted signals by first boosting them (Anal. Chem., DOI: 10.1021/ac202548n). Its developers say that the method could help researchers analyze low-abundance compounds in patient samples and discover small-molecule biomarkers for disease.

NMR is a powerful tool, says Daniel Raftery of Purdue University, but spectral overlap seriously limits its use with complex samples. Glucose is often a prime offender: Its NMR signal can dominate spectra of biological samples such as blood. The problem is magnified in samples from patients with diabetes, for example, whose urine can contain significantly higher concentrations of glucose than of other biomolecules.

Current methods for cleaning up NMR data, such as 2-D NMR or glucose removal from samples, lengthen the analysis time or risk changing the sample and introducing errors, Raftery says. To reduce glucose signals without compromising resolution, throughput, or accuracy, he and his team developed a technique they call “add to subtract.” The researchers take an NMR spectrum of a biological sample, and then spike the sample with glucose to roughly double its concentration. They then acquire a second spectrum.

They use a computer program to scale up the peaks from the initial spectrum and subtract them from the spectrum of the spiked sample, resulting in a clean, glucose-free spectrum, containing only information for the remaining molecules in the sample. The researchers demonstrated the technique using serum and urine samples from healthy donors. In both samples, they could spot several amino acids that were difficult or impossible to analyze in the unprocessed spectra.

The team is currently working to extend the technique to other types of biological samples, Raftery says. They think that their “add to subtract” idea should also work with other types of spectroscopy.

Advertisement

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.