If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



Less Acid Rain Could Mean More Mercury In Fish

Pollution: Norwegian team proposes connection between increasing pH in lake waters and bioavailability of mercury

by Mark Schrope
February 13, 2012

Good And Bad News
Credit: Gunnhild Riise
Lakes, including this one in Norway, have seen less acid rain but also higher levels of mercury in fish.
Lake in southern Norway.
Credit: Gunnhild Riise
Lakes, including this one in Norway, have seen less acid rain but also higher levels of mercury in fish.

Regulations on mercury emissions in Europe have led to a steady decline in mercury entering the environment since the 1990s. So government scientists in Norway were surprised to discover in 2009 that mercury levels in lake fish had strongly increased since 1991. Researchers now propose that this could be the result of another environmental success story: reduced acid rain (Environ. Sci. Technol., DOI: 10.1021/es3002629).

When the government’s mercury data in fish came out, Ståle Haaland, a limnologist at Bioforsk, the Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research, and his colleagues were studying how reductions in acid rain changed lake chemistry. As rain’s acidity drops, the pH of lake waters increases, which they found makes organic material from soil surrounding the lakes more soluble (Environ. Sci. Technol., DOI: 10.1021/es903179j).

Other researchers had shown that dissolved organic carbon can react with relatively inert forms of mercury—including those stored in lake sediments from times when mercury inputs were higher—to produce methylmercury. This form of the metal is the most toxic for humans and readily moves up through lake food webs, eventually accumulating in fish that people eat, such as trout and perch. The recent government report described trends in methylmercury levels in these fish.

So Haaland’s team decided to compare lake concentrations of organic carbon and mercury in hopes of understanding the counterintuitive mercury increases in fish. When the researchers examined government data on organic carbon levels in three southern Norwegian lakes where regulators had detected increased mercury levels in fish, they saw a strong correlation between organic carbon levels and the fish mercury levels. The researchers point out that because the data are limited, they cannot draw definitive conclusions about the connection. But they think that their hypothesized mechanism could be at play in other regions in Europe as well as in the U.S.

Mark Marvin-DiPasquale, a microbial ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in Menlo Park, Calif., who focuses on mercury research, says the researchers have an interesting hypothesis, but he’s eager to see further research. “There’s a whole long laundry list of other things that could explain this trend,” he says, such as the increase in pH leading to more iron entering the lake. Some research suggests iron also can play an important role in mercury methylation.

Collin Eagles-Smith, an ecologist with USGS in Corvallis, Ore., who also studies mercury, is similarly intrigued. If true, this connection presents environmental scientists with a real conundrum, he says, “where amelioration of one environmental threat exacerbates another.”



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.