Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

Capturing Carbon Dioxide With A Small pH Change

Carbon Capture: An electrochemical device captures 80% of the greenhouse gas from simulated flue gas

by Erika Gebel Berg
October 17, 2013

Cleaner Coal?
[+]Enlarge
Credit: Shutterstock
Scientists developed a new method for capturing carbon dioxide from the flue gas from coal-fired power plants.
Photo of a coal-fired power plant emitting flue gas
Credit: Shutterstock
Scientists developed a new method for capturing carbon dioxide from the flue gas from coal-fired power plants.

Coal-fired power plants produce one-third of the carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. Scientists have been developing strategies to capture this carbon and prevent its release into the atmosphere, in hopes of curbing global climate change. But so far, those methods are too expensive to implement because of their high energy requirements. Now, researchers report a novel electrochemical method that could capture CO2 using less energy (Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, DOI: 10.1021/ie402538d).

Gas To Liquid To Gas
[+]Enlarge
Credit: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
A carbon-capture device consists of two chambers separated by a cation-exchange membrane (CEM). A sodium phosphate buffer cycles from a basic capture chamber (left) to an acidic release chamber (right). A current running through the device maintains a pH of 8 in the basic chamber and a pH of 6 in the acidic one. Flue gas bubbles through the basic chamber, where carbon dioxide becomes bicarbonate. As the rest of the flue gas is vented from the device, the bicarbonate-enriched fluid cycles into the acidic chamber, where the bicarbonate turns back into CO2 for collection.
Illustration of an electrochemical device that captures carbon dioxide from flue gas
Credit: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
A carbon-capture device consists of two chambers separated by a cation-exchange membrane (CEM). A sodium phosphate buffer cycles from a basic capture chamber (left) to an acidic release chamber (right). A current running through the device maintains a pH of 8 in the basic chamber and a pH of 6 in the acidic one. Flue gas bubbles through the basic chamber, where carbon dioxide becomes bicarbonate. As the rest of the flue gas is vented from the device, the bicarbonate-enriched fluid cycles into the acidic chamber, where the bicarbonate turns back into CO2 for collection.

The flue gas that wafts from the smokestacks of coal plants contains around 15% CO2. Carbon-capture methods separate out the CO2, purify it, and collect it for sequestration or for use in industrial applications. Currently, the most efficient carbon-capture method, according to Seth W. Snyder of Argonne National Laboratory, is to bubble the flue gas through an aqueous solution of amines. The amines react with the CO2, trapping it in solution. The method captures about 95% of the CO2 from the flue gas, but to recover the CO2, the amine solution must then be heated up under vacuum, which requires a hefty energy input. Using this technology in coal plants would double the cost of electricity, Snyder says.

To help bring costs down, the researchers sought a method that doesn’t need additional energy to release the captured CO2. Snyder came up with a method that exploits the chemistry of CO2 in water under changing pHs. In a sodium phosphate buffer, CO2 can exist either as a bicarbonate ion when the solution is basic, or in its gaseous form when the solution is acidic. So a device could capture CO2 by passing flue gas through a basic solution, forcing CO2 to dissolve as bicarbonate. Then the device could release the pure CO2 by bringing down the solution’s pH to reform the gas, allowing it to bubble out of the solution.

Snyder and his colleagues built a carbon-capture device that continuously pumps a phosphate buffer between two chambers separated by a cation-exchange membrane. By running a current through the device, the researchers use electrochemical reactions to maintain a pH difference between the two chambers, so that one has a pH of 8 and the other had a pH of 6. Flue gas enters through the basic chamber, and then the resulting bicarbonate solution is pumped to the acidic chamber, where purified CO2 exits. To speed up the bicarbonate-to-CO2 conversion, the researchers added the enzyme carbonic anhydrase to the acidic chamber, which catalyzes the transformation.

To test the device, the team used a simulated flue gas containing 15% CO2. By measuring the CO2 in the flue gas after it went through the device, the researchers determined that their method captures 80% of incoming CO2. The gas that escaped from the acidic liquid was more than 98% pure CO2.

This study was a proof-of-principle test, Snyder says, so his team hasn’t determined how much energy the method would require to run on large scale. They next plan to look at the method’s efficiency and possibly increase it by using a more stable version of carbonic anhydrase.

“I think this is a great study,” says Jamie A. Hestekin of the University of Arkansas. “To attack such a challenging problem, we definitely need different ways of doing things, and for that I applaud this paper.” In future experiments, Hestekin thinks the team should test the device with real flue gas, which is filled with impurities that could interfere with the process. For example, sulfur-based compounds could knock out the enzyme, he says.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.