ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Implementation of EPA’s pending rule to cut carbon dioxide from power plants could prevent some 3,500 deaths by 2020 and would lead to greater health benefits than a simple tax on CO2, air quality researchers say. In their study, they examined three possible ways to reduce CO2 emissions and analyzed them with computer modeling. They concluded that the method most resembling EPA’s pending regulation would prevent the most heart attacks, premature deaths, and emergency room visits for respiratory ailments (Nat. Clim. Change 2015, DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2598). That’s because it would, in addition to cutting CO2, reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulates, and mercury. The researchers hail from Syracuse University, Boston University, Harvard University, and the think tank Resources for the Future.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter