If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



Top 50 U.S. Chemical Producers

The economics of the chemical industry haven’t changed much in the past year, but its structure has

by Alexander H. Tullo
May 11, 2015 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 93, Issue 19

Click here for an interactive look at the US Top 50 that lets you sort by company and year, with complete data going back to 2004. Be sure to also check out our Global Top 50 information presented in the same interactive format.

Judging by the data in C&EN’s latest survey of the Top 50 U.S. chemical producers, 2014 wasn’t a bad year by any stretch. But it was a more topsy-turvy period for chemical companies than they have seen in a while. Sales and profits slipped. At the same time, robust deal-making left a mark on the ranking.

Credit: Air Products
An Air Products employee practices checking for leaks at a training site in La Porte, Texas.
An Air Products  training facility in Texas.
Credit: Air Products
An Air Products employee practices checking for leaks at a training site in La Porte, Texas.

The 50 companies combined for $323.4 billion in revenues last year, a slight, 0.5% decline from 2013. The Top 50’s sales record of $333.6 billion, hit back in 2011, still stands.

Twenty-one firms posted a decline in sales, although only five saw decreases of more than 10%. Four of the five were involved with mergers and acquisitions (M&A) that reduced revenues.

The 42 firms that report operating profit figures together made $39.4 billion, a 0.5% slip from the previous year. Some 23 companies experienced a decline in profits. Two companies, coal tar chemicals maker Koppers and pigments supplier Ferro, posted slight losses. The operating profit margin for the 42 firms was 14.1%, down slightly from 14.2% in 2013.

Despite the lackluster financial performance, stock prices have held up well. The 31 public chemical firms in the ranking combined for a market capitalization of $369.7 billion at the end of 2014, a 1.9% increase from a year earlier.

But the aggregate number is slightly misleading. An individual investing in a random chemical company on Jan. 1, 2014, would likely have lost money by Dec. 31. Some 22 firms saw stock prices decline. Six of them—Chemtura, FMC, Koppers, Kronos, Olin, and Stepan—saw their market value decline by more than 20%.

The group’s total market capitalization rose because of the outsized influence of a few larger firms—notably Air Products & Chemicals, DuPont, and PPG Industries—that made up for declines seen at the lower-valued firms near the bottom of the ranking.

Overall, the numbers in the survey reflect a chemical industry that stood its ground in 2014. Cheap natural gas feedstock continues to drive strong profits for chemical makers, and demand for chemical products has been healthy.

But in 2014, the industry started to feel headwinds. Oil prices finished the year at $53 per barrel, half of what they were at their peak last June. By the end of the year, chemical prices had started to fall in kind. Moreover, a strong dollar has weakened the revenues U.S. firms are reporting from their foreign subsidiaries.

And the headwinds aren’t letting up. According to data released late last month by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. gross domestic product increased at an annual rate of only 0.2% during the first quarter of this year.

Martha Gilchrist Moore, senior director of policy analysis and economics at the American Chemistry Council, a trade association, isn’t surprised by the numbers. An unusually cold and protracted winter disrupted retail and home sales, the stronger dollar hurt exports, and lower oil prices affected investments, especially in oil and gas drilling.

But she sees the economy improving. “If you peel back the onion, there are some real good fundamentals for continued growth,” Moore says. For instance, the underlying demand for cars and houses, which are foundational chemical markets, is strong. Household formation is up. Wages are increasing. And lower prices at the fuel pump are boosting consumers’ discretionary income.

Moore expects a repeat of 2014. Then, the U.S. economy shrank 2.1% in the first quarter but bounced back to a healthy 2.4% gain for the full year.

Last year, according to ACC, U.S. chemical output increased 2.0%. For 2015, ACC has forecast a 3.7% increase, though Moore says that number will likely be revised slightly downward when the trade group releases its midyear forecast in June.

Though the performance of the U.S. chemical industry as a whole didn’t change much in 2014, C&EN’s ranking did see movement.

The ranking of the top seven firms, led once again by Dow Chemical, didn’t change. Fertilizer maker Mosaic declined from eighth to 10th. Air Products and Eastman Chemical each moved up a slot to fill the vacuum.

Brisk M&A activity left a mark on this year’s ranking. Ashland declined from 15th to 22nd because it sold its water treatment chemicals business to the private equity firm Clayton, Dubilier & Rice for $1.8 billion.

Other firms acquired businesses. Westlake Chemical’s purchase of German polyvinyl chloride maker Vinnolit helped lift it from 24th to 21st. A full year of Champion Technologies on Ecolab’s books assisted that company’s rise from 13th to 11th.

Three companies dropped from this year’s rankings. Goodyear Tire & Rubber, 48th last year, departed because it didn’t sell enough rubber. Propylene producer Petro­Logistics, 50th last year, was purchased by Koch Industries. Carlyle Group’s sale of its 47% interest in PQ Corp. preempted an initial public offering and hid that company’s results from public view.

These firms have been replaced by specialty chemical maker Emerald Performance Materials, 48th, and Minerals Technologies, which makes precipitated calcium carbonate and debuts at number 50. Americas Styrenics joins the list at number 33. The company is a joint venture between Chevron Phillips and Trinseo, which went public last year and is now regularly revealing Americas Styrenics’ sales information.

Telly Zachariades, a partner with The Valence Group, an investment bank that specializes in chemicals, expects the robust pace of M&A activity to continue into this year.

Strong drivers for deal-making persist, Zachariades says. Companies that want to grow are purchasing businesses, and others are still pruning their portfolios of unwanted operations. Financing is available and is relatively cheap. And chief executives who make sensible strategic acquisitions have been rewarded with appreciating stock prices.

Another driver is activist investors. Valence counts 14 firms under pressure from such proactive shareholders, the most famous example being Nelson Peltz’s attempt to thrust four directors onto DuPont’s board. Activist shareholders are believed to have instigated some deals, such as Ashland’s sale of its water treatment chemicals business.

However, Zachariades believes the influence of these investors on M&A can be overstated. “I would probably say no more than 20% of the activity has had activists involved in some way,” he says. “It is certainly a factor in our industry but not the main driver.” By and large, the activists have catalyzed companies to act faster than they otherwise would.

With or without additional M&A, C&EN’s ranking will be different next year because of previous mergers. Merck KGaA is set shortly to complete the purchase of number 35 Sigma-Aldrich. Albemarle completed its purchase of Rockwood Holdings earlier this year. Eastman bought Taminco.

Newcomers will emerge as well. DuPont is set to spin off its performance chemicals business as Chemours later this year, creating a large new company that will no doubt debut near the top of next year’s ranking.

For an interactive look at the Top 50 U.S. chemical firms visit


This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.