Environmental Working Group launches cosmetics verification program | November 9, 2015 Issue - Vol. 93 Issue 44 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 93 Issue 44 | p. 7 | News of The Week
Issue Date: November 9, 2015

Environmental Working Group Launches Cosmetics Verification Program

Branding program is intended to help consumers avoid toxic ingredients
Department: Business
Keywords: toxic chemicals, cosmetics, personal care, endocrine disrupters

The Environmental Working Group, an activist organization, has launched a verification seal for personal care products intended to help consumers avoid toxic chemicals and contaminants that it says are commonly found in cosmetics.

The seal, known as EWG Verified, will make shopping “easier for overwhelmed consumers who want to quickly find a bottle of shampoo or a tube of toothpaste that is better for their health,” says Ken Cook, the group’s president. Two small cosmetic makers, Beautycounter and MyChelle Dermaceuticals, will be the first program participants.

Products eligible for the mark cannot contain probable reproductive, carcinogenic, or environment-damaging toxins, EWG says. Among the ingredients the group proscribes are paraben preservatives and nitro- and polycyclic musk fragrance ingredients, all of which it considers suspected endocrine disruptors.

However, personal care products that include synthetic chemicals aren’t automatically barred from receiving the EWG seal. Although sunscreen formulas aren’t covered in the new verification program, the group has argued in favor of certain synthetic sunscreen ingredients permitted in Europe but not allowed in the U.S.

Seal-eligible products must also meet other criteria such as scoring high in EWG’s Skin Deep cosmetics database and fully disclosing ingredients on packaging labels. Only products that “meet our robust criteria, as opposed to minimal government standards,” are eligible to receive the mark, says Nneka Leiba, the group’s deputy director of research.

Leiba says she hopes the program will spur development of safer products. If successful, the group plans to roll out the program to other goods it tracks such as cleaners and food.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Eru Sen (November 9, 2015 8:58 PM)
This is a new low for you, C&EN. The EWG does not perform any scientifically sound safety assessments. These folks are not scientists and their database is the result of such safety measures as, whether or not the staff can pronounce a cosmetic ingredient name. Statements such as "...of which it considers suspected endocrine disruptors," are just the tip of their baseless conclusions iceberg.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment