ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Of 186 chemists surveyed:
80% think too much focus on applied research stymies scientific advancement
78% think that potential chemists choose other fields because those fields have more newsworthy breakthroughs
75% think that potential chemists choose other fields because medical research innovation is associated with biology
21% think there are insufficient opportunities to collaborate with researchers in other fields
84% think that being technologically savvy is crucial or very important for career advancement
Source: Elsevier
Innovation in the chemical sciences is stifled by overemphasis on applications at the expense of basic research, a survey of chemists says.
“Chemistry is often regarded as having less ‘pull’ than other disciplines, such as biology and physics, and its contributions often go unrecognized,” says Tim Hoctor, vice president of professional services at Elsevier, which conducted the survey. “This is why we were particularly interested in gaining a better understanding of the industry, and of chemists’ views into the factors that may hinder innovation.”
Of the 186 industry professionals in the chemical sciences who took the survey, 80% said that too much focus on applied research is hindering breakthroughs.
Nearly 80% also said that they believe potential chemists choose other fields for careers because medical research innovation is more associated with biology than chemistry, and because advances in other fields get more media coverage.
“Chemistry is at the heart of many of the innovations being enjoyed by the public today,” comments Susan Morrissey, director of communications at the American Chemical Society, which publishes C&EN. “ACS supports and encourages all members of the chemistry enterprise to communicate the vital role of chemical professionals and chemistry in addressing the world’s challenges.”
More than 80% of survey respondents also said that being technologically savvy is very important to career progression in the chemical sciences, but they also had mixed opinions about what that means in practice.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter